Sunday, January 31, 2016

A Greek Bearing Gifts



Philippians 2:25-30

The poet Virgil first suggested caution when faced with a Greek bearing gifts.  When it comes to large wooden horses that might be sound advice, but Paul had found that one Greek gift-bearer was a man of commendable character.

Look at how Paul describes Epaphroditus:
1.  Brother
                        If Timothy was a "son" to Paul, Epaphroditus was like a brother.  This may suggest the two men were close in age.
                        “Brother” is a term showing the riches of our new relationship with Christ.  Epaphroditus--is derived from the name of the Greek goddess Aphrodite (Venus to the Romans).  Although the name came to mean "lovely" or "charming" it originally meant "devoted to Aphrodite".  His parents were probably worshippers of the goddess; no Jewish couple would have given their son this name.
We don't know when Epaphroditus was converted, but we do know that Paul, the Jew, had found a brother in this man whose heritage was so different from his own.
[In the United States, February is “Black History Month,” a time for celebrating the contributions of African-Americans to our history and culture.[1]  We will probably hear Dr. Martin Luther King’s words:
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit together at the table of brotherhood.

Of course, Reverend King knew such a table already existed.   We call it the Lord’s Table, that place where Christians meet to celebrate Jesus’ work on our behalf, work to bring us salvation and reconciliation—reconciliation to God and to each other.  Of course, Reverend King also knew Christians, black and white, too often forgot what their shared faith was supposed to do for their day-to-day living, forgot the kind of society Christ wanted his people to model for the world.  We’re a long way from being that model.  Perhaps February would be a good time to pray about racial reconciliation.  We’re encouraged to do so when we recall Paul calling Epaphroditus “Brother.”]

2.  Fellow-worker
                        They had labored side by side in the cause of Christ.
                        He may have been the pastor or he may have been one we would have described as a very active layman.  The distinctions between clergy and laity were not so sharp in the early church as they would later become.  Every Christian understood the need to work for the cause of Christ.

3.  Fellow-soldier
                        They had fought together in the trenches; they understood they were engaged in a common battle. 
            As a soldier, Epaphroditus's allegiance would be clear.  (cf. Eph. 6:12 If Ephesians was, as many believe, a circular letter to the churches of Asia Minor, the Philippians would be reminded at all Christians are called to be 'soldiers of the cross.')

4.  A Minister of Help (30b)
                        He had accomplished his task of bring encouragement to Paul.
                        He brought both material and moral support.
[Lately I have been studying the life of Jonathan Edwards.  Famed as a leader of the Great Awakening, Edwards was also one of the most profound thinkers in American history.  I’ve learned he suffered periodic bouts of bad health.  His health was often at its lowest when he was facing times of greatest stress.  Were there encouragers who helped him during this time?  I hope so.  In any case, I know pastors—including your pastor—need those willing to encourage.]

5.  A Lover of the Saints
                        Epaphroditus was genuinely anguished over the distress his sickness was causing.  The word describing his feelings was the same used for Christ's anguish in the garden of Gethsemene.
When many would have focused on their own problems, he was concerned about others.
He longed to be with the Christians at Philippi.

6.  A Risk-taker for Christ. 30
            The phrase 'risking his life' is a gambling term, parabolani.  
In the Roman world, when an epidemic struck a city most able-bodied residents would flee.  After telling about Christians who risked their lives to remain in plague-ridden cities to care for the sick and dying (pagan and Christian alike), David Curtis comments,

There should be in Christians an almost reckless courage which makes them ready to gamble with their lives in service to Christ and others.  You won't die prematurely, so go ahead and take some risks.  Epaphroditus laid everything on the line for the Kingdom of God.


Some observations on discipleship drawn from the story of Epaphroditus.

1.  The Christian life is sometimes marked by surprising--even ironic--moments.
            Epaphroditus had gone to care for Paul, Paul had to care for Epaphroditus.
            Such events don't suggest God has lost control.  We don't always know the reasons why things happen the way they do.
            Was the providence of God at work in his sickness?  With his mind on Epaphroditus, Paul could not dwell on his own circumstances.

2.  The story of Epaphroditus challenges us to keep sickness and suffering in perspective.
            You've probably encountered those Christians who believe sickness and suffering in a believer's life are sure signs of sin or lack of faith.
            The notion is an old one (even Jesus had to eradicate it from the minds of his followers-John 9). It is a persistent notion.  One modern commentator actually accused Epaphroditus of sinful overwork.
            Sometimes we just get sick--despite all our effort to avoid germs, etc.  A good Christian is not exempt from trouble, but that trouble is never beyond the power of God to give us strength.

3.  A Christian fellowship should attempt to minister beyond the narrow boundaries of its locale.
            Epaphroditus represented the church in Paul's prison cell.  He went where they could not go.
            It was a costly ministry.  The church lost a valued laborer while Epaphroditus was gone.

4.  Some of our most valued relationships grow out of experiences of ministering together.
            Paul had discovered that as he carried the message of Christ from city to city.  Wherever he
ministered he left behind dear friends.
            Is going to church an insipid experience for you, is there little thrill for you in following Christ?
            Are you involved with your fellow Christians in ministering for Christ?
            Has a former commitment to serve and minister waned? 

CONCLUSION

In the musical Annie, Daddy Warbucks states an element of his philosophy:  "It doesn't matter who you step on while on your way up, as long as you don't come back down."  It’s a philosophy that exists in more places than Broadway musicals.  You may work with people who live by that philosophy. 

1.  Epaphroditus never embraced such a philosophy and the world is better for it.

2.  Have you determined to exhibit a Christlike spirit of “otherishness”?  It reflects Christian love.



[1]  The event has its critics, even among African-Americans, but anyone who has sat in as many history classes as I have knows the focus is often on one culture over others; someday we may not need such a month but we’re not there yet.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

A Man Sent from God




John 1:6f
Every once in a while someone sends me a story they’ve found on the Internet.  Now, careful researchers will tell you that you have to be, well, careful about what you find online; some of what’s there just isn’t true.  With that in mind, I’m sharing the following story I was sent.  I don’t know if it’s true but it makes a point.
It seems that at an unnamed American university there was a professor who was an atheist.  Now, I can tell you that not all professors are atheists bur it such stories they often are.  Anyway, this professor delighted in challenging the faith of his young students. 
On the first day of the new semester the professor stood before a class of freshmen and said, “I don’t believe in God.  I know some of you do, so I propose a little test.”
With that he stepped up on a wooden chair and declared, “If there is a God, let him knock me off this chair in the next ten minutes.” 
As the minutes ticked away the professor repeated his challenge.
Most of the students, only recently out of high school, squirmed uncomfortably in their seats, especially those who were believers.  But there was a student who was older than all the rest.  He was an ex-marine who had been in some tough spots on the battlefield and felt he was there in that class only by God’s grace.
When the professor announced there was only one minute left the ex-marine stepped forward and kicked the chair out from under the professor.  The professor went sprawling onto the floor.  Looking up, he shouted, “What’s the meaning of this?”
The ex-marine answered, “God was busy, he sent me.”
Whatever you may think of that story it does remind us of an important point:  God almost always uses human agencies in carrying out his work, especially when that work involves our salvation.
John—the Gospel Writer—follows his profound introductory words with the simple statement, “There was a man sent from God whose name was John.”  Of course he was speaking of John the Baptist.
Luke takes great pains to tell us the Baptizer’s history.  He was born into a priestly family, his mother was named Elizabeth and his father was Zacharias.   Luke, who was probably a physician, tells us that John’s birth was miraculous because Elizabeth was well past childbearing years.  He also tells us that Elizabeth and Mary, the mother of Jesus, were related.  Consequently, John, who was about three months older, was also related to Jesus.  Although the term doesn’t mean quite what we mean, Jewish people would have said they were cousins.
But John the Gospel Writer doesn’t tell us that.  He sums up the matter by saying, John “was sent from God.” 
 We actually know less about John’s life before the beginning of his ministry than we do about that of Jesus.  After telling us about the circumstance surrounding his birth Luke leaves us with this comment, “John grew up and became strong in spirit. Then he lived out in the wilderness until he began his public ministry to Israel.” (Luke 1:80)
Some have suggested John lived with the desert sect called the Essenes but not even that is certain; if he did, his message and ministry was ultimately different than theirs. What is certain is that when he did appear on the scene he did so with a clear sense of purpose.
He had a mission, a mission that was of singular importance--"He came as a witness, to testify about the Light, so that all might believe through him."

It was a life-consuming mission.  One of the most popular religious books this past year has been Rick Warren's Purpose Driven Life.  John lived such a life; he came to testify to the Light so all might believe.  He carried out that mission with such faithfulness that to this day he is known as Christ’s forerunner.  John had the privilege of actually ushering Jesus Christ onto the stage of world history.
The significance of that act is found in verse 9:  “The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world.”  What is meant by lighting every person?  The Light Christ brought was not intended for only one people, only one culture, only one place; this is biblical universalism.  Christ came for all; all need him.  John’s work would be to say, “The Light is coming—soon, very soon.”
Naturally, John attracted attention.  His costume and diet were austere.  Elsewhere were told, “This very John had his clothing made of camel's hair, and wore a leather belt around his waist; his food was dried locusts and wild honey.”  [The thought of eating an insect that looks like a grasshopper on steroids may be repulsive but locusts were on the kosher diet list for Jews.]
 His message was cutting and sometimes shocking.
He called everyone to repent and be baptized—everyone, even the Jews.  That was shocking because baptism was the means by which Gentiles entered the Jewish religion; Jews might undergo ritual washing but not baptism.  Calling his own people to baptism was, in effect, saying, “You’ve got to see yourselves in a whole new way.  Whatever you may have clung to before as a basis for receiving salvation is of no consequence.”
He graciously accepted as sincere the penitent Roman soldiers who came to him, simply telling them to prove their sincerity by changing their behavior toward the week and oppressed.
Yet, when religious leaders came requesting baptism—apparently without that same sincerity—he said to them, “You sons of snakes, who warned you to flee the wrath to come?”
No wonder he inspired both curiosity and confusion. 
Apparently, some even began to ask if he might be the great prophet Elijah, returned to earth to call the people to get ready for the coming of the Messiah.  Some people took literally a prophecy found in Malachi about Elijah’s return.  Others wondered if John might be the Prophet—the one Moses predicted would come.  And, some even dared to suggest he might be the Messiah.  How did John respond to all this speculation?  Listen.
19.   Now this is the testimony which John gave when the Jews sent priests and Levites to him from Jerusalem, to ask him, "Who are you?"
 20.   He frankly admitted, and did not try at all to deny it; yes, he frankly admitted, "I am not the Christ."
 21.   So they asked him again, "What are you then?  Elijah?"   And he answered, "Of course, I am not."   "Are you the prophet?"   He answered, "No."

When pressed he did offer an answer, one drawn from imagery found in the writings of the great prophet Isaiah.
Then they [envoys from Jewish leaders in Jerusalem] said to him, "Who are you?  Tell us, so that we can have an answer to give to those who sent us.  What have you to say for yourself?"
 23.   He said, "I am a voice of one shouting in the desert, `Make the road straight for the Lord,' as the prophet Isaiah said."

John was saying, “My whole ministry is to point beyond myself, to draw attention to Another.”  What did John say about this one who would soon follow him?  He said that he was unworthy to untie his sandals.  Untying a person’s sandals was the job of a slave.  John was saying, “I’m not even worthy to be this man’s slave.”
When asked to justify his baptizing so many people, John essentially said, “You think this is something?  Just wait.” John seems to suggest that the envoys were missing the point.  He stops answering them directly and turns the focus of the dialogue.  More important than what he was doing was the fact that there was already One whom the Pharisees did not know, One who was far more important than John.  He would soon be coming.
Just how would he come?  Maybe John wasn’t even sure.  He probably never expected it to happen the way it happened.
One day Jesus simply showed up to be baptized.  From the accounts in the other Gospels we know that John resisted at first, feeling unworthy to baptize the one he recognized as his spiritual superior.  Only after Jesus assured him of the propriety of the action did John comply. John the Gospel Writer doesn’t tell us about that sacred moment; instead, he lets us see the spiritual impact of the event on John the Baptist.  John becomes even more convinced that Jesus is the one who will carryout God’s plan.
He is so convinced that he urges two of his own followers to consider Jesus.
I want to pause in this review of the Baptizer’s career to ask a question:  Why did John the Gospel Writer include this story of John the Baptist?  I think the answer has two parts, one concerns the Apostle John’s immediate situation and the other concerns his long-term purpose.
à  To begin with, John the Gospel Writer may have been answering some of John the Baptist’s faithful followers who were feeling that they were being disloyal to consider the claims the Christian preachers were making about Jesus.  John the Gospel Writer treats John the Baptist with utmost respect.  He identifies him as being sent from God, a man with a powerful ministry.  But he adds that John the Baptist always looked beyond himself, pointed to a Greater One who would come.  Even John the Baptist knew that One was Jesus of Nazareth.
à John the Gospel Writer’s other purpose in mentioning John the Baptist may have involved the Baptist as a model for those who are on mission from God to call others to believe in Jesus.  For the remainder of this message I want to focus on some ways he’s a model for us in this way.
If you’re on mission from God to call others to believe in Jesus, be careful you don’t fall into the trap of self-promotion.
We’ve already seen how John refused to allow the slightest confusion about his identity.  Years later the Apostle Paul would write that those who had been transformed by Christ should not think more highly of themselves than they ought to think.  John tried hard to keep others from thinking more highly of him than they ought to think.
John’s refusal to be caught up in self-promotion is seen in another way.  Apparently Andrew and John were not with the Baptist when he made his startling announcement about Jesus being the Lamb of God.  So, when Jesus again passed by, John repeated his testimony—“Look, the Lamb of God.”  This time John (the future Gospel writer) and Andrew heard.
John must have known what would happen.  His disciples began to follow Jesus.  His words seem to have had the effect of relinquishing his claim on his disciples so they would be free to follow Jesus.  There were many teachers in that day, each with his own band of followers.  They tended to hold onto those followers with great tenacity, their success was judged by the number of disciples who flocked to hear them.  Sometimes teachers became jealous of the success of another teacher.    Paul would be the object of such jealousy.  Yet, John practically sends his disciples away.  Obviously he had other disciples but these two were among the most memorable and may have been the most promising. 

The next time we encounter John in the Gospel is in chapter three.  Jesus is becoming better known and he is attracting more and more followers.   The Gospel reports a conversation John had with his followers about this phenomenon.  It begins as a theological discussion.
23.  John also was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because there was much water there; and people were coming and were being baptized--24.  for John had not yet been thrown into prison. 
 25.  Therefore there arose a discussion on the part of John's disciples with a Jew about purification.
 26.  And they came to John and said to him, "Rabbi, He who was with you beyond the Jordan, to whom you have testified, behold, He is baptizing and all are coming to Him."
 27.  John answered and said, "A man can receive nothing unless it has been given him from heaven.
 28.  "You yourselves are my witnesses that I said, 'I am not the Christ,' but, 'I have been sent ahead of Him.'
 29.  "He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom's voice. So this joy of mine has been made full.
 30.  "He must increase, but I must decrease.”

In an age such as ours those words must sound especially remarkable.  The International Standard Version gets at what John is saying, “He must become more important, but I must become less important."
Can you imagine how John would react if he could surf through some of the religious programming available today?  What would he say as evangelists and pastors were greeted with thunderous applause as they stood in the spotlight on stage or as they were whisked away to luxury hotels in stretch limos? 
You and I may not face those dangers, but we can still get caught in the trap of self-promotion.  We can promote our church, our denomination instead of Christ.  We can undercut the witness of another Christian because she is not from our group.
Like John, we need to put Christ first.
If you’re on mission from God to call others to believe in Jesus, you have to make sure people know who Jesus is and what he has done for us.
As I reviewed this passage I discovered that John the Baptist had an amazingly succinct, yet comprehensive, understanding of who Jesus was and what he would do in the world.
1.  He declared Jesus to be “the Lamb of God.” 
We may not know all that John had in mind when he used that term but what seems clear is that Jesus would somehow deal with the problem of sin.  The use of the word “lamb” probably hints at a coming sacrifice;  again, John may not have understood all that Jesus would do but he wanted to clearly state that Jesus had come to deal with the world’s greatest  problem.
In our day it’s hard to convince some people they have a sin problem.  But once we do convince them, we had better be prepared to point them to Jesus as the answer.
2.  He declared Jesus to be the chosen one to carry out God’s purpose.
John doesn’t explain all of how he knows this but it’s clear he does.  Jesus had a purpose, he accomplished that purpose.  He could accomplish this because he was God himself.
When we tell others about Jesus we may have to make it clear he was not just another religious teachers who said a lot of lovely things.  We will have to make it clear that he was truly unique, singular.  He was the Son of God.
3.  He declared Jesus to be the one who would bestow the Holy Spirit.
John the Baptist’s Jewish audience would have known that the Messiah was expected to usher in the age of the Spirit.  John says that the Christ would give the Spirit.
Part of calling others to believe in Jesus is assuring them that Christ will be present in their lives to do his transforming work.  He does this work through his Spirit.
If you’re on mission from God to call others to believe in Jesus, you should expect to see people radically transformed.

When John the Baptist called on people to repent he called them to a new way of living.  Baptism was crossing the threshold into a new life.  He expected new attitudes and new behavior.  There would be a reordering of their lives. 
Sometimes it seems we’ve stopped expecting lives to be transformed by people coming to Christ.  Even worse, we not only don’t expect people to change, we pessimistically suggest that some people can’t change.  We need a new vision of what Jesus can do.

Conclusion
As far as we know, John the Baptist performed no miracles. 
As far as we know, John the Baptist wrote no books.  Oh, some suggest he may have actually written the Revelation before it was edited by Christians but the only scholars who take such claims seriously are the handful of scholars who make such claims.
John never did any of those things yet Jesus said of him, “John was a lamp that burned and gave light…”
John’s task was tougher than ours.  Still, we are called to give light by calling others to believe in Jesus.  Will we do the task as well?




Saturday, January 16, 2016

TABLE TALK


“This reminds you that Jesus loves you very much.”  Those were the words used when the minister gave the elements to my grandson as he participated in the Lord’s Supper on Christmas Eve.  My grandson is five.
Hearing the story, I recalled an incident that took place several years ago.  It was our monthly observance of the Supper and we had guests—a family with young children.  As the elements were distributed, the parents allowed their children to take the bread and the cup.  A venerable saint sitting nearby saw this and was not pleased.  She said to the parents, “This is serious and we don’t let little children take part.”  Those parents never returned.
Doubtless, many Baptists would praise her—though they, themselves, might not have been bold enough to scold the parents.  Funny, it’s “the Lord’s Table.”  I wonder if he would be so fussy about children enjoying a simple wafer and a bit of juice.
And, of course, those who served my grandson were right: the Supper is a reminder that Jesus loves us very much.
Back in the eighteenth century Solomon Stoddard shocked many New England Congregationalists by suggesting the Supper was “a converting ordinance” and allowing those who had never professed conversion to participate.  He hoped the repeated reminder of Christ’s gracious sacrifice would prompt personal commitment to him.  (Apparently Stoddard finally sensed he was a recipient of God’s grace while participating in the Supper, so he hoped others would have the same experience.)  Anyway, some of his fellow pastors agreed, many did not.  The controversy about who can and cannot “take communion” continues today.
The churches I have served practiced “open” communion; we invited all believers to join in the celebration of the Supper.  Some Baptists are uncomfortable with that, insisting only fellow Baptists or, more narrowly, only their fellow church members may participate.
The debate erupted days after I began serving my church in Texas.  I was a nervous, naïve, new pastor as I officiated at the Lord’s Supper for the first time.  I felt relieved to have gotten through it without a mishap and happy we had visitors that morning.  It was a day for firsts because that evening I moderated at the first business meeting since becoming pastor.  I asked for new business and a member challenged me, “Since when do we practice open communion?”  I was caught off-guard; the pulpit committee had told me the church practiced open communion!  It was a tense few moments as I stammered around trying to explain.  The discussion ended when a deacon said, “If a non-member takes the elements, you’ll have to snatch them out of their hands because I’m not going to do it.”
I’m glad no one snatched the elements from my grandson’s hands.  Church can be a scary enough place for a child.  I’m also glad he heard the simplest explanation for what was happening.  He didn’t need to hear words like “Eucharist,” “sacrament,” “ordinance,” or “transubstantiation” (indeed, if someone had tried to explain that concept, he likely would have thought they were kidding).  He had a better chance of understanding “Jesus loves you very much.”  He understands what it means to be loved (though, like all of us, he could spend his life trying to understand the meaning of God’s love).
As an evangelical I understand the power of the word, the evangel, the word of God’s love for us.

Whether we call it the Eucharist, the Lord’s Supper, or communion, the rite embodies that word, the evangel, that Good News.