Tuesday, June 30, 2020

My Enemy, The Hero

Richard could listen no longer. For hours the cries of the wounded begging for water had disturbed the cold December night, cries of his comrades and cries of the enemy, cries of fellow human beings unable to stumble or even crawl off the battlefield. In their cries, perhaps he heard the voices of his brothers who were serving elsewhere. Despite his youth (age 19), Richard was a sergeant; but a mere sergeant cannot order a cease fire, cannot negotiate a truce, cannot tell the combatants to take their guns home and let the politicians fight it out. But he could take water to the wounded. What an insane idea. Rightly, his commanding officer refused permission. But Richard persisted. The commander relented; secretly sure he would lose a good soldier to enemy fire. 
Bedecked with canteens, Richard walked unarmed onto the battlefield. Enemy soldiers held their fire, uncertain what Richard was doing. They watched, astonished and admiring, as Richard moved among the wounded, giving water with no regard to the uniform the suffering soldier wore. We may debate the meaning of “hero” but those men to whom he gave water or blankets during those incredible ninety-minutes would insist Richard, who would die in another battle the next year, deserved the title. Others agreed. A statue in his memory stands near the battlefield where he performed his act of mercy.
I hope it’s one statue that’s left alone, one statue allowed to recall the heroic decency of Fredericksburg's  "Angel of Marye’s Heights.” A man who was wrong. A man who did what was right. Richard Rowland Kirkland, Confederate soldier.

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

My Church Has No Statues of Jesus--But Still

Shaun King is calling for statues of Jesus to be destroyed. Actually, he wants statues depicting Jesus as a white European to be destroyed (Goodbye, Michelango’s “Pieta”). He claims depicting Jesus as a white is an attempt to promote “white supremacy.” I don’t know about that, but I do know artists have been representing Jesus to reflect their own cultural background wherever Christianity has gone. Mexican folk art depicts Jesus as brown-skinned (just as the famed image of the Virgin of Guadalupe depicts Mary with brown skin). A popular Peruvian Nativity scene has the infant Jesus wearing a colorful chullo, with Mary, Joseph, and the shepherds dressed in traditional Peruvian garb. Well before this, a tenth-century mural from what is now east-central China depicts Jesus as (ready?) Chinese.
Maybe, Shaun has never heard James Taylor’s little Christmas carol Some Children See Him. You probably know the words:
Some children see Him lily white,
The baby Jesus born this night.
Some children see Him lily white,
With tresses soft and fair.
Some children see Him bronzed and brown,
The Lord of heav'n to earth come down.
Some children see Him bronzed and brown,
With dark and heavy hair.
Some children see Him almond-eyed,
This Savior whom we kneel beside.
Some children see Him almond-eyed,
With skin of yellow hue.
Some children see Him dark as they,
Sweet Mary's Son to whom we pray.
Some children see him dark as they,
And, ah! they love Him, too!
Maybe Shaun is unaware most Christians—thoughtful Christians, at least—know Jesus didn’t look like blue-eyed Jeffrey Hunter (King of Kings, 1961) or stood almost 6’2” like Jim Caviezel (Passion of the Christ, 2004). Indeed, some Christians suggest Jesus may have more likely resembled Jamie Farr (M*A*S*H’s Cpl. Klinger).[1]  
Maybe Shaun doesn’t know taking the Christian doctrine of the incarnation seriously would imply Jesus resembled a Jew of the first century. Shaun apparently takes his depiction of Jesus from Revelation 1:14-15 (and I thought only fundamentalists took the Revelation literally). John probably wasn’t trying to invoke the Jesus who walked the roads of Galilee, but the apocalyptic Lord who was about to do business with the enemies of God’s Kingdom. No, the Jesus who did walk those roads didn’t look European, Asian, Hispanic, or African. He was Semitic, probably no taller than other Semitic men of the time, his musculature was likely that of any man who worked with carpentry or stone mason tools; his voice would have been strong to be heard by the thousands who sometimes came to hear him. We’re probably not told what he looked like because it doesn’t matter; what mattered were his words and what he did—for everyone.
If Shaun King wants Jesus to look African, I get it. But Jesus can’t, indeed won’t, be confined to any culture. He transcends cultures—that’s why his religion is the most widespread in the world. This Jesus would call on white racists to repent, while calling on non-whites to abandon hatred to embrace love and forgiveness. This Jesus longs to instill in each heart—no matter its owner’s color—a vision for a new world.
True, some white Christians haven’t followed the life and teachings of the one they honor with statues and paintings. But neither have some Hispanic Christians, Asian Christians, or African Christians. Yet, still there will be Christians who portray Jesus as having their faces—not to suppress others, but to imagine Him close.


[1] An insight I recall coming from Philip Yancey.

Friday, June 19, 2020

White Thoughts On Juneteenth

I don’t recall her name, but I know she deserved better.
In the late 1970s, Pat and I were living in New Orleans where I was doing doctoral studies. Both Pat and I had jobs: she as a teacher, I as the assistant manager of small store in one of the city’s upscale malls. One fall, needing to hire a new clerk, the manager and I conducted preliminary interviews of applicants. I interviewed a young woman who was bright, smartly dressed, and well-spoken; in her first year at a local college, she needed a part-time job to stay in school. I arranged an appointment for her at the main store on Canal Street where she could be interviewed by the owner (whose family had opened the store in the early days of the Civil War). A little over an hour after she left, I received a call from the owner. He was irate. After admitting I had sent the young woman downtown, he said, “Don’t you ever send a black person down here. We aren’t going to hire a black to work in our store!” With that, he hung up. I spent the rest of the afternoon wondering if I was about to be fired.
Racism. Four decades after that experience, racism is still with us. I’d like to think things are better, but are they? Some things have changed. A few years before my experience in New Orleans, I worked in a restaurant supply warehouse, supervised by a man who left to become Springfield, Missouri’s first black police officer. When we moved to Ohio, twenty years later, Columbus had a black chief of police. Local stores are managed by men and women of all races. The nation has had a black president. And Marvel has black superheroes.
During those years, I have performed mixed-race weddings, seen black doctors, and worked with an African American deacon. Still, racism remains part of our culture. And, so I must occasionally ask myself, “Am I a racist?”
It’s a complicated question. I have a friend—a white, thirty-something female—who offers an argument something like this: If you say you aren’t a racist, you probably are; if you say you are a racist, you probably aren’t. Huh! And don’t even attempt to say, “I try to be color-blind when I deal with people.” Apparently that attitude belittles the distinctive and proud African American heritage. I (white male, remember) face charges of white privilege. I think I understand what that means but I’m not sure what I can do about it—assuming it exists. Now, I discover I am susceptible to something called “white fragility.” (Were such notions thought up by sociologists, of whom C. S. Lewis was especially wary?) Folks who talk of such things believe they see racism everywhere.
And they’re always watching. If I choose the longer line at the grocery store where the checker is white, unlike the checker with the shorter line; if I question the opinion of the doctor at the “urgent care” who happens to be black; if I avoid eye-contact with the black man boarding the plane, hoping he won’t sit by me—I am likely a racist. Pretty obvious. Maybe.
If skin pigmentation were the only criterion shaping my behavior and attitudes in those situations, racism is almost certainly involved. But, what if previous experience has taught me that clerk with the shorter line is the slowest clerk in the store; what if the doctor didn’t listen when I told her (note the subtle avoidance of sexism) about my previous experience with this rash; what if I don’t want to talk with anyone about football and my potential seatmate is wearing an “I-bleed-scarlet-and-grey” sweatshirt? For each instance, I’ve offered a potential paradigm shift that may alter any assessment of my behavior.
Am I a racist because I would hesitate to walk down Columbus’s Hague Avenue at 1:00 am? Some might say yes, but I suspect many blacks in Columbus would hesitate to walk that same street in the middle of the night, festooned as it is with shot detection equipment. America’s problem is that those same blacks suspect they would face curbside interrogation by the police if they took a midnight stroll around Worthington’s green; while the police might be content with my explaining I was getting some air after a long evening of writing. We whites, who live here, might like to think better of our little town but we might be ignorant of what blacks endure.
Shortly before moving to New Orleans, I was working at a large store in Houston, one of three full-time employees in the luggage department. Then, the store hired a young black man named Wayne to work part-time with us during the Christmas season. The department manager, a retired Army Sergeant-Major, told him, “Well, we’ve never had a colored person work in the department but I’m sure you’ll do fine.” As soon as Wayne and I were alone, I apologized for what the manager had said. “That’s alright,” Wayne said, “I never try to correct anyone over fifty.” I wondered if I would have had that much patience. Now that I’m well over fifty, I wonder if there are black, Latinos, or Asians who patiently ignore my faux pas.
But Wayne said something else. “I don’t even try to correct my grandmother,” he explained, “when she makes a stereotypical remark about white people.” While anti-white racism (or at least racial stereotyping) is unquestionably found amongst blacks, I can’t allow myself to be distracted by it or, worse, allow it to excuse my own racism—or the racism of my fellow-whites.
I can think of only one incident where I was a victim of racism. Again, the setting is New Orleans, at the seafood counter of a large grocery store. Pat and I were next in line, a black woman behind us. When the clerk—black—finished with the customer before us, she asked the woman behind us what she wanted. Pat and I were surprised but didn’t say anything. The next week Pat used the experience to explain to her students why line-cutting is unfair. Pat hadn’t mentioned the clerk or the other customer’s race but a black co-worker who heard the story asked. When Pat said both were black, her co-worker explained, “She could have gotten a lot of flak from other blacks in the store if she had been seen taking a white person ahead of a black person.” Now, the racism I experienced cost me about five-minutes, the racism some blacks face might cost them their livelihood or even their lives.
Of course, that took place decades ago. And things are different now, yet somehow the same. Racism somehow seems to be passed on from one generation to the next.
I’ve studied history most of my life. If I could change anything about American history, I would have the early experiments with slavery fail, fail so spectacularly that Americans never again attempted to use slaves. The Civil War would have never occurred. There might have been sectional issues in American politics, but they wouldn’t have focused on slavery. There would have been no Christian leaders scrambling to justify “the peculiar institution” by distorting the Bible. Segregation and the quest for white supremacy would not be seminar topics. Juneteenth would just be June 19th.  But you can’t change history. Some of America's great Christian leaders were slave owners or proponents of slavery. Racist interpretations of the Bible were taught in pulpits; I heard them. Our parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents endorsed “Jim Crow” laws and believed schools should be segregated. I attended a high school with more than 3,000 students, all of them white. I never met a black person until I was in college.  But don’t assume racism belongs to the Builder/Buster generations; the list of celebrities who’ve lost jobs for racist tweets includes many who are in their twenties or thirties.
Racism is complicated. I don’t need a PBS special, a journal article, or a book to tell me it’s complicated.
Truth is, the more we talk about systemic racism, white privilege, or white fragility the worse we (white people) feel about ourselves. And, the worse we feel about ourselves, the better we feel about ourselves. We are enamored with guilt. But guilt accomplishes little. Never has.
But, surely, the decision to treat people fairly is the first step on the road to ending racism or, at least, my racism. But apparently that’s too simple. We want a more complex answer. Still, if Christian love prompts me to love everyone—to seek the best for others, regardless of their skin color—I will want every man and woman to have the opportunity to achieve their highest potential, I will insist access to good housing and employment be available to all, I will challenge local government to police the police, perhaps through citizens’ review boards, I will vote for candidates who do not judge others by their color or their accent, I will plot to undermine the unjust structures holding people back, I will seek to be a welcoming neighbor. All of that will come from the decision to love.

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

A Black Life That Mattered

I’m working on an essay about racism and I keep recalling this incident. I shared it in 2016 and think it might be worth sharing again. 

Years ago, a black woman began attending our services.  Betty, a retired schoolteacher, knew some of our members from an interdenominational Bible study she taught.  Invited by those members, she visited the church.  She kept coming.  Each Sunday she offered an insightful comment on my sermon as she left; she especially seemed to appreciate their Biblical content.  Then one morning she asked if she could talk with me in private at some time.  We set up an appointment for early that week.
At the office, Betty seemed tense but got quickly to the point. “I’d like to join the church,” she said, “but I won’t do if it would cause you any problems.”  I was happy to tell her it would cause no problem at all, that the people would be thrilled she wanted to become a member. 
She relaxed and began talking freely.  “I’ve attended black churches my entire life,” she said, “but lately things have changed. I don’t think I can go anymore.”
“How so,” I asked.  I assumed she was about to tell me that black churches, like so many white churches, had begun to deny certain aspects of Biblical truth—the authority of the Scripture, the deity of Christ, the need for salvation, etc.  Her answer surprised me.
“The pastor of the church I attended for so long started preaching hate against white people. I know too many good white people and I can’t stand it.”
Not a little shocked, I recall saying something like, “Betty, we would love to have you as part of our church but maybe that’s just one pastor at one church.”
“No,” she said, “I’ve visited every black church in town and all of them are preaching hate against whites.”
Do I believe Betty visited every black church in Columbus?  No, I suspect she only visited churches she believed taught biblical truth; she wouldn’t have visited churches built around a “personality.”  But, knowing Betty, I’m sure she visited enough churches to make her statement worth pondering.
Betty and I had our conversation a quarter-century ago.  She passed away in the early 2000s.  I wonder what she would say about what is happening in our nation.
The kind of teacher who loved and was loved by her students, she doubtless would mourn every black man (or woman) killed by the police—or by gang violence.
A genuine Christian and a policeman’s widow, she doubtless would mourn the death of any policeman killed in the past few years, praying for their widows and children—regardless of their race.
Betty was not naïve.  She knew racism was an ever-present reality.  Her visit to my office proved that.  If she was bitter about racism, she never showed it; nor did she deny racism's impact on her life.  An art student at Ohio State, she had dreamed of being a fashion illustrator.  She once showed my wife and me sketches she had drawn in the mid-forties.  They were beautiful and could have graced any magazine in the days before computer-enhanced images.  But, placing the drawings back in their tattered folder, she said her professor had told her no magazine would hire a black woman as an illustrator.  So, she became an art teacher.  No, it wasn’t fair.  But Betty trusted God and made a life by inspiring students rather than selling couture. 
Again, I wish I could ask Betty her thoughts on what is happening.  I can’t. But I can almost hear her say, “Pastor Jim, we must begin by praying. Then we have to show people Jesus’s love.”




Thursday, June 11, 2020

Words About the Police

It’s been many years since I took high-school Spanish, I don’t remember much of it. Sure, living in the Panhandle gave me an opportunity to speak Spanish, but I didn’t—most of the Hispanics I met spoke English far better than I spoke Spanish. Consequently, when I’m in a Mexican restaurant, I hope the server speaks English.
So, while I am really fuzzy about verb conjugations, I do remember a few lessons, like this about two nouns: “el policía” and “la policía.” Simply, the former refers to the police officer; the latter, to the police department. I wonder if these distinctions might be useful in the discussions going on in the nation right now.
No one can watch Officer Chauvin pressing his knee into Floyd George’s neck until George could no longer gasp, “I can’t breathe” and approve.  Nor can anyone be proud of Chauvin’s fellow-officers standing-by and doing nothing. But does this mean the Minneapolis police department, indeed all police departments across the nation, should be disbanded? Should we assume, as some apparently do, that every police officer is either a bully or a racist? Should we conveniently forget the many officers—men and women, of all races—who have given their lives serving and protecting their communities?
If the images of George’s murder (I think the term appropriate) don’t stir our emotions, we’ve become callous. Those emotions may send us to the streets to protest. But it is dangerous to allow emotion to rule in these matters. Officer Chauvin and his colleagues deserve to be prosecuted; the thousands of other police officers across the nation who play by the rules don’t deserve to be slandered.  
Most of us, having grown up with the sight of police cars and the sound of sirens, not to mention hundreds of “cop shows” on television, easily forget the modern police force is relatively new. British Home Secretary Robert Peel revolutionized policing in Britain and is counted as the founder of London’s Metropolitan Police (Scotland Yard). The nine principles of policing, attributed to Peel—though not without controversy—are worth reviewing in toto; but I’ll cite only four:
--“The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.”
            --“The degree of cooperation of the public that can be secured diminished proportionately to the necessity of the use of force.”
--“Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient.”
--“Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.” (“Sir Robert Peel’s Nine Principles of Policing, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/16/nyregion/sir-robert-peels-nine-principles-of-policing.html. Accessed 11 June 2020.)

Of course, Peel’s principles were suffused with optimism. Reality sometimes took a different shape. By the mid-1850s, London police were sometimes called “The Truncheonists,” a reference to their tendency to use their cudgels or nightsticks. Some of the police were violent in response to violence. And, doubtless, some of the police were violent because they were violent men (“WPCs,” women police constables, didn’t appear until later). Police department have always been forced to weed out the bullies and sadists.
Yet, in time, the attitude toward police began to mellow. True, the Brits are always ready to jibe about “Constable Plod,” but the value of the police was recognized. One British police icon has been the blue lamp outside police stations since about 1861. The lamp became a symbol of British policing, and simple reminder to the community that someone was there to protect them.
This brings us back to the distinction between “el policiá” and “la policiá.” Individual officers may be good or bad. Departments may be poorly run, indifferent to the safety of the community; or efficient, trying to be faithful to their mandate to protect and serve.  There may be good officers in bad departments and bad officers in good departments. There are good white officers, good black officers, good Asian officers, good Hispanic officers. And bad ones in each group. 
The weeding process, going on since the days of Sir Robert Peel, must continue. Old-boys’ networks must be broken up. The stranglehold of police unions must be challenged. Indeed, the unions may have to revisit their agenda, their ultimate values.
What happened in Minneapolis is a turning point in the quest for equality. Floyd George’s death will be remembered. Our response will be remembered too. We need change, the right change.
 I've no vested interest in defending the police. Some officers bring dishonor on their badges. But not all--far from all, I suspect. We need to remember that.