Saturday, March 26, 2016

Hope in the Wake of Failure



“Hope” is big in Christianity.  When we talk about Easter it’s hard to avoid the message of hope.  Of course, we often connect that message with the hope we have in what seems to be the most hopeless of situations:  Death.  I usually tried to acknowledge that even in my small congregation there were those who had lost someone in the year following the previous Easter.  Easter can be a time of hope for those people.  It contains a message of comfort for all believers.  But hope has other facets as well.  There is the hope that tomorrow will be better than today.  And there is the hope for a better you.  There is hope in the wake of failure.

John 21:1-19
Someone has said that the Gospel of John begins with Jesus as a guest at a wedding reception and ends with him hosting a picnic by the lakeshore. 
This story takes us back to the night before the crucifixion.  Something happened that night which is recalled in each of the gospels:  the prediction of Peter’s denial.
It appears to have taken place following the supper and before Jesus moved on to the Garden of Gethsemene.  On that last night, Jesus began speaking in veiled terms of the crucifixion.  He said he was going where the disciples could not come:
   JN 13:36 Simon Peter asked him, "Lord, where are you going?"
    Jesus replied, "Where I am going, you cannot follow now, but you will follow later."

    JN 13:37 Peter asked, "Lord, why can't I follow you now? I will lay down my life for you."

    JN 13:38 Then Jesus answered, "Will you really lay down your life for me? I tell you the truth, before the rooster crows, you will disown me three times!

That was a bold declaration of commitment.  Peter pledged to stand by Jesus no matter what.  In fact, some might even say that Jesus’ words were a downer in the face of such a declaration of loyalty.  In fact, Mark tells us that Peter protested what Jesus had to say.  “’No,’ Peter insisted, ‘Not even if I have to die with you!  I will never deny you!’”  At this point the other disciples spoke up and made the same pledge; this after Peter had implied that he would remain devoted even if all the others—his friends he had been traveling with for three years—should decide to abandon Jesus.
Surely we wouldn’t condemn him for having excessive pride, he was just resolute.
Well, what happened?  Was Jesus right or did Peter surprise him by standing firm?
To know the answer we have to look ahead a few hours.  Jesus had shared some of his deepest teachings about the Holy Spirit and about eternity.  He had been arrested and taken off for a quick trial before the religious and political authorities.
Where was Peter?  John tells us because he was there.  With one eye on Jesus and one on Peter, John watched the drama unfold.
A little slave girls asked Peter if he was one of Jesus’ disciples.  Peter said, “I’m not.”             While Jesus was being interrogated, Peter joined some of the other servants and soldiers warming themselves next to a fire they had built in the courtyard.  Someone—Luke says it was the servant girl again—asked, “Are you sure you aren’t one of his disciples?”  Again, Peter said, “Nope, I’m not.”
Just then, another servant looked closer at Peter and said, “Just a minute, I know you.  You were in the garden with him, weren’t you?”  This time, Peter used some strong language to say, “Get this straight, I am not one of his disciples.”  At this point, John adds, at that moment a rooster began to crow.”
Jesus was right, Peter was wrong.
Now, there’s something we need remember about Jesus.  Early on in his Gospel John offers an important observation about Jesus that I think we ought to keep it in mind whenever we see Jesus interacting with another man or woman.  In John 2:24, we’re told that Jesus “…knew what people were really like.  No one needed to tell him about human nature.”
I don’t think that means Jesus was merely a good armchair psychologist; I think it means he had the capacity to size up an individual, to see their potential even if no one else did, to know their strengths and weaknesses.  Jesus, who had once predicted the day would come when Peter would be known as “The Rock”, knew the fisherman wasn’t quite ready to have his devotion face the ultimate test.
Before you and I give way to the temptation to look at Peter, shake our heads, and say, “That Peter, he should have known,” we need to recall our own experiences. 
Some of us have made bold declarations, full of resolution and determination. 
Maybe you’ve said, “Next time I have an opportunity to witness, I won’t keep quiet, I’ll speak up for Jesus even if my friends laugh at me.”
 “Next time I face that temptation—to gossip, to look at pornography, to take home a few office supplies—I’ll say, ‘No, I won’t.’”
 “Next time I’ll put my family first, before my job, before sports;  I’ll make time for my wife and kids.”
 “Next time I’m invited to join in the complaint-fest about what’s going on in the church I won’t do it; I’ll look for ways to build up my church rather than tear it down.”
Maybe you made these statements with the same degree of determination as Peter but when the next time came, you failed.  When that happened maybe you felt like Peter who, as the other gospels tell us, went outside and wept bitterly over his failure. 
Several years ago Christian balladeer Don Francisco told Peter’s story in song.  It struck a responsive chord with many who heard it.  The song begins with Peter and the other apostles hiding behind locked doors, afraid the soldiers would take them as they had taken Jesus.  Then, on what would be known as the first Easter morning, a breathless Mary came to say the tomb was empty.  Peter and John go to investigate.   They found the tomb empty.  Listen to Francisco’s description of Peter’s feelings.

Well, something strange had happened there, but, just what I didn't know.
John believed a miracle but I just turned to go.
Circumstance and speculation couldn't lift me very high,
Cause I'd seen them crucify Him, then I saw Him die.

Back inside the house again, the guilt and anguish came.
Everything I'd promised Him just added to my shame.
When, at last, it came to choices, I denied I knew His name.
And even if he was alive, it wouldn't be the same.

Like Peter, we sometimes anticipate so much from ourselves and fail so miserably.  Like Peter we wonder if our relationship with Christ will ever be the same.  We know it’s hard to have hope in the wake of failure.
This brings us to a picnic by the lake. 
Déjà Vu All Over Again

Since the Risen Jesus had already appeared to them at least once we can guess the topic of almost every conversation when the disciples got together.  Surely if someone you know, love, and admire defeats death by walking out of his tomb, you’d talk about it.
Maybe the conversation reminded Peter of his denial, maybe he realized that someone needed to make some money, maybe the cupboard was bare and they were hungry.  For whatever reason, late one evening Peter announced to the six other disciples with him, “I’m going fishing.”  And the others said they’d go with him.
Now, remember, several of these men were professional fishermen.  Still, though they fished all night, they caught nothing.  As they rowed toward the shore, they saw the faint glow of a campfire and the shadow of a man standing by the water.  The man shouted to them, “You catch anything, boys?”
No doubt with all the enthusiasm of anglers everywhere when they have to admit the creel is empty, they shout back, “No.”
Instead of saying, “Too bad” or “Better luck next time,” the Man on the shore said, “Throw your net out on the right hand side of the boat and you’ll get plenty of fish.”
Tired and hungry the disciples apparently say to themselves, “It couldn’t hurt,” and then throw out the net.  As they begin to draw it back there’s resistance, the net is full of fish.
For Peter, James, and John, at least, it was déjà vu all over again.  Years before they had had a luckless night fishing, years before a man standing on the shore told them to throw out their nets one more time, years before they had a record catch of fish.  The man whose instructions had produced that record catch was Jesus, Jesus who told them, “Follow me.  From now on you’ll be fishing for men.”
John, who had either a gift for seeing what others didn’t see or a gift for stating the obvious, said to Peter, “It’s the Lord!”
Peter, who had stripped to the waist to work, grabbed his tunic and plunged into the water.  He wanted to get to the Lord as soon as possible.  The text says, “they were only out about three hundred feet”—that seems like quite a swim to me but maybe Peter was used to it.  Anyway, once Peter and the other disciples were on shore Jesus invited them to breakfast.  My purpose is not focus on the meal itself but to remind you that the last time Peter had eaten with Christ the meal ended with Jesus’ accurate prediction of Peter’s denial.

A Private Discussion in Public

John tells us that this was the third time Jesus had appeared to a group of the disciples.  As John reports these appearances, the first confirmed the fact of the resurrection to the disciples as a whole, the second appearance allowed Jesus to deal with the questions raised by Thomas;  now, this third appearance would allow him to deal with Peter.
Both Luke and Paul tells us that the Risen Christ appeared to Peter sometime on the first Easter but the details of that experience are hidden from us.  Whatever may have transpired is never revealed.  But, if Peter was to overcome the power of his past failure and become an effective leader and coworker with the other disciples, it was necessary for this private discussion to take place in public.
Restoring Peter’s hope in the wake of his failure involved three steps.
The Element of Assessment
To understand what Jesus was doing in asking his cycle of three questions we have to understand something about the language he used.  Unlike English, Greek has three verbs that can be translated as love.  Jesus used two of them here.  [I should tell you that some commentators feel there is no significance in this but I think John is too good a wordsmith for this to be coincidence.  Besides, A.T. Robertson, one of the finest Greek scholars in the 20th century, thought it was significant and that’s a pretty good testimony.]
First, Jesus asked, “Peter, do you love me more than these men do?”  In this question Jesus used the word agape the word that signifies the highest, noblest, most selfless love.  At the same time, he invited Peter to compare his love with that of his fellow disciples. 
It’s easy, especially if we’ve faced few trials and temptations, to think that our love for Christ is greater than that of a fellow believer who may be struggling with doubt and with failure.
Peter had once said he would stand by Christ even if everyone else deserted him.  Now he knew better.  So, Peter responded using a verb for a less-intense love, “Yes, Lord, you know I have great affection for you.”
In the second question, Jesus simply asked, “Peter, do you love me?”  Again he used the word for the strongest love.  If Peter wasn’t going to claim a greater love than that of his fellow disciples, would he at least claim to have this highest love for Jesus.
No, he wouldn’t.  Again he says, “Lord, you know I have a great affection for you.”
Once again Jesus asks, “Peter, do you love me?”  At this point Jesus switches verbs, he used the word which means “to have great affection.”  He and were on the same page.
Because Peter so vividly recalled his threefold denial of Christ that third question caused him to feel deep grief for his cowardice.  Still, he answered, “Lord, you know my heart better than I know it, and you know I have a great affection for you.”
This was a painful moment for Peter.  It hurts to have our hearts laid bare but it’s sometimes important if we are to ever be healthy again.  At the same time, it was important for his fellow disciples to know that Peter had come to a realistic view of himself.  They wouldn’t have been able to work with a man they believed thought himself better than they were.  Now they knew he didn’t. 
When we fail it isn’t always necessary for Jesus to demonstrate before our closest friends that our pride is in shambles, that we have a new, healthier view of ourselves.  It was necessary in Peter’s case because his wild claims had been so public and so forceful.  Still, when we fail it is important that we come away with a more realistic view of ourselves.  We need to see that it’s dangerous to claim too much for ourselves.  In Paul’s words we need to have come to a place where we no longer thing more highly of ourselves than we ought to think.
That lesson can be learned in the secret, private places where we encounter the Lord through is Word and the Spirit.  We can demonstrate that lesson by living with a new humility.
As we look at the work Jesus was doing in bringing Peter back to a place where he could have hope in the wake of failure, we also need to look at another element in the process.
The Element of Acceptance
Jesus responded to each of Peter’s honest, heartfelt declarations of devotion with a commission:
à “Feed my lambs.”
à “Shepherd my sheep.”
à “Feed my sheep.”
Those simple phrases speak volumes.  Jesus is saying to Peter, the man who failed so miserably, “I’m accepting you where you are and I want you involved in the lives of my people.”
We can be pretty harsh in our judgment of losers like Peter.  We might have said Peter was all washed up; he can come sit in the pew, sweep the floors but not much else.  He’s a failure and we can’t ever forget that.  But as harsh as we are, that loser is often harsher.
We can all be thankful that Jesus handles failures differently.  He takes the shambles of our lives and rebuilds. 
If you have a brother, a sister, a child who’s blown it in their pilgrimage, don’t write them off as hopeless.  Chances are Jesus hasn’t.
If you’ve blown it, been a class-A failure, don’t give up on yourself.  Chances are Jesus hasn’t.
He didn’t with Peter and he’s had a lot of experience rebuilding wrecked lives since then.  The interview with Peter ends with a third element.
The Element of Affirmation
Now, it was déjà vu all over again—again.  Jesus, as he had so long ago, said to Peter, “Follow me.”  It was a powerful affirmation, it was as if Jesus had said, “Peter, I once told you I wanted you to follow me, I haven’t changed my mind.”
When Peter left his fishing business to follow Jesus he probably had big dreams of becoming a big man.  He expected Jesus to establish a kingdom, to attain power and authority; and he expected to have his share of that power.  No one would say, “Pete, mend that net” or “Peter, clean those fish.”  He would be in charge of his life.
It took time—a lot of time—and a brutal crucifixion before Peter began to see that the Kingdom Jesus was building was not one of political or economic might.  It would be a spiritual Kingdom.  And, despite his failure, Jesus still wanted him to be one of its builders.
When you and I fail we desperately need some type of affirmation that says we may still be of use to Jesus Christ in his Kingdom-building work.  He may give it to us through the word of a fellow Christian, a Scripture passage, or some unexpected turn of events in our efforts to minister for him, but he his grace he gives it to us.
As it was with Peter, that word of affirmation may take a unique, individual shape. 
Listen to what Jesus said to him:
I assure you, most solemnly I tell you, when you were young you girded yourself [put on your own belt or girdle] and you walked about wherever you pleased to go. But when you grow old you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will put a girdle around you and carry you where you do not wish to go.

On the one hand, what Jesus said to Peter about his future was brutally honest.  On the other hand, it implied that when the eventual test came, Peter would remain true to Christ.
John, who was writing years after Peter’s execution at the hands of the Romans, adds this comment on what Jesus had said to Peter, “He said this to indicate by what kind of death Peter would glorify God.”
Did you hear that?  The man who failed, the man who talked big but acted small, the man who may have felt shame each time he heard a rooster crow, brought glory to God by his death.
CONCLUSION
Peter’s story is encouraging because each of us has failed to live up to our expectations for ourselves as followers of Christ.
It’s encouraging to know that even if we fail, even if we lose that sense of closeness to God, through recognition and repentance, we will hear him welcome us back to the table.
This was as story of moral and spiritual failure.  We may fail in other ways as well. We may fail in business, in a relationship, in school.  The principles at work in this story can help regenerate hope in the wake of that failure.
·       We need to take time for a serious search for the roots of our failure.
·       We need to rediscover and, perhaps, refine the vision that motivated us in the first place.
·       We need to surround ourselves with those who will affirm and encourage us.
The important lesson in this story is this:  No matter how spectacular our failure Jesus can turn things around.  Jesus can transform our lives in such a way that they bring glory to God.
If you were for some reason unable to attend a church service this Easter, I hope this sermon has reminded you of what Easter means.
If you did attend a service I hope you heard a message rooted in the Bible’s portrait of Jesus’ victory over the grave.
If your pastor talked about the significance of Easter for the Christian faith, I hope he reminded you that each Sunday is a kind of  “little Easter.”
If your pastor marshaled the evidence for the historical reality of Easter, I hope she took a moment to address the “so-what question” that event raises.
Above all, I hope your pastor reminded you that Easter is about hope.







Saturday, March 19, 2016

The Order of the Towel and Basin

John 13:1-17

Textual Introduction:  Jesus’ public teaching has come to an end.  In the next few chapters, he will teach some of his most profound lesson to his small band of disciples, those who had been with him from the beginning, teach them during the few hours before the crucifixion.
*******
Circumstances and schedules conspired to keep our youth from going on what has become an annual mission trip.  I’ve had the privilege of going with them on each of their trips.
You’ve heard the stories of meeting Native Americans on the Cherokee reservation, of painting houses, of dealing with children in Bible clubs, of visits to nursing homes, of nightmarish bathrooms, of hordes of wasps; and, most recently, of angry rioters burning homes only a few blocks from where we were staying.  You haven’t heard as much about the evening worship times. 
These were usually encouraging and often inspiring.  Still, I always looked forward to the final night with a kind of dread.  You, see the Thursday night meeting always concluded with a foot-washing service. 
From our first trip to Cherokee we’ve asked the local leaders to make sure each person knew they had the right to decide for themselves if they would participate. 
We’re we trying to be hard to get along with?  I hope not.  I think we were acknowledging that this passage has created some issues for Baptists over the years.  Some of our fellow Christians are convinced Jesus was instituting a third ordinance, along with baptism and the Lord’s Supper.  In fact, some Christian groups conduct a foot-washing service whenever they have communion.  They believe the act is a sign of humility.  One writer actually implied a congregation wasn’t healthy unless it practiced foot-washing.
The irony is these groups often believe they are being more humble than the rest of us.
Other groups focus on the cleansing Jesus speaks of and argue that foot-washing symbolizes our willingness to forgive the hurts and slights we may have received from that person whose feet we’re washing.
The fact someone has to go to such an effort to explain the rite probably means they’ve missed to point Jesus was making.
By the way, from what I can determine, the rite of foot-washing didn’t appear in the church until the fourth-century.  Does this mean I believe any group of Christians who observe this practice is doing wrong?  No.  It does mean I believe the danger of missing the point of this story is very real.
As often seems to happen in John’s Gospel, there may be several levels of meaning in this account but ultimately I believe Jesus is calling those who believe in him to display a spirit of service.
Jesus had some final lessons to teach his disciples and he does so dramatically by providing a visual aid.
To do so he casts himself in the role of a servant.  But, of course, this was nothing new.  Paul reminded the Philippians that Jesus had conducted his whole earthly ministry in just such a servant spirit.  Quoting what may have been an early Christian hymn, Paul says:
Your attitude should be the kind that was shown us by Jesus Christ, who, though he was God, did not demand and cling to his rights as God, but laid aside his mighty power and glory, taking the disguise of a slave and becoming a man. Christ humbled himself and he humbled himself even further, going so far as actually to die a criminal's death on a cross. (2:5-8)
Keep that in mind as we examine this story.

Look at 

The Servant’s Example


In the ancient world most travel within a community and often from community to community was on foot.  Even when a traveler was careful to bathe, his feet would inevitably become soiled and dusty from the roads.  Most hosts made sure a servant stood ready to wash the feet of those who entered the home.  This courtesy not only cleaned the dust from the feet but tended to refresh the traveler.
To omit this courtesy was highly irregular.   Yet, as important as it was, washing another’s feet was considered a menial task, one to be performed only by a servant, a child, or your wife. 
So, when the disciples gathered for what would be their last Passover meal with Jesus, no one offered to perform the duty of washing the feet of those attending. 
The other Gospels tell us that the disciples had been debating about which one of them was the greatest so no one was about to do anything which might imply he was inferior to the others.  Apparently, no one even felt compelled to wash Jesus’ feet because to do so might lead to the expectation that they would move on to wash their fellow-disciples’ feet.  Consequently, the meal began with their feet unwashed. 
Now, at this point you might say, “Well, why does it matter, they didn’t eat with their feet, they ate with their hands?”  And, hygienically you’d be right.  The problem was the attitude that led to the breach of etiquette.  Pride and a complex sense of self-importance prompted their behavior.
What if this self-serving attitude, with it attendant passion for self-promotion, had been allowed to remain unchallenged, unchecked at they moved into the future?
§ No one would have placed the needs of the Kingdom of God above his or her needs for comfort and security.
§ No real cooperation would have been possible, especially if it involved sharing credit or recognition for any good accomplished.
§ No one would have been willing to serve in the small, out-of-the-way place without constantly scheming to secure the larger, prominent place.
§ None of the entrenched leaders would have been willing to hear a new idea from anyone not in their circle.
§ No one—as Barnabus did for Paul (as John and Peter apparently did for others)—would have been willing to mentor a younger disciple lest that individual gain greater prominence than they.
The list could go on but you can see how the church would have been crippled if such self-serving attitudes dominated.
They had already settled into eating.  Jesus, no doubt at the head of the table, looked at the men who had spent the past few years with him, looked at them with love.  Within twenty-four hours he would make the ultimate sacrifice for them and for those who would believe in the future.  Even though the ordeal of the passion was only a few hours away, he thought of them.  So, as John tells us, “Jesus got up…and laid his [outer] clothes aside. He took a towel and wrapped it around his waist…put water in a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet.”
Culturally, this was unheard of.  In Judaism a teacher did not carry any burden if one of his disciples was nearby.  That disciple would gladly take it and carry it for his teacher.  Jesus’ actions may have easily shocked the disciples into momentary silence.
But on another level, there is something beyond the cultural anomaly in his actions.  R. C. H. Lenski, the Lutheran New Testament scholar who taught so long at Capital, wrote this comment on verse 3 (“Jesus knew that the Father had put everything into his hands.”):
 “All things were in Jesus’ hands when those hands washed the disciples’ feet.  Yet we see that these hands are still in deepest humiliation--they have almighty power but do not use this power in majesty.  John emphasizes the consciousness of Jesus that all things were in his hands in contrast with the traitorous hands of Judas and all the hellish powers that stood back of this action.  John intends to say that, although Jesus knew all things were in his hands in those hours of hastening toward his death, he did not smite the traitor and the foes in league with to his son of perdition but followed his course of love, completed his mission, and of himself laid down his life to take it up again.”
The hands that John has told us created the world wiped away the dirt and dust from his disciples’ feet.
This same attitude of self-sacrificing service would take Jesus to the cross.  There he would fulfill the Prophet Isaiah’s predictions regarding the work of the Suffering Servant who would surrender himself to abuse for the sake of his people.  There his goal would be salvation.
Now, his goal was to awaken his disciples to how much their own attitudes needed to be transformed.
Of course, they didn’t waken to their need without protest.  Peter’s response shows this.
Peter protested that this just wasn’t right.  It was clearly wrong for the teacher to wash the feet of his disciples.  Now, notice that, at this point, Peter is only protesting the violation of cultural norms and is, by no means, offering to finish the job himself.
Jesus’ initial response to Peter was direct and, possibly, not unprecedented.  He said, “Wait, Peter, you don’t know what’s going on here.”
Peter, perhaps thinking he did know what was going on, said, “No way, Lord.  You’re not going to wash my feet, not now or ever.”
Now, think about that, “Lord” and “No,” in the same sentence.  Before we scold Peter too much we had probably better review the tapes to make sure we’ve never said something similar.
Anyway, it’s Jesus next statement that really captures his attention.  Jesus said, “If I don’t wash your feet, you have no part of me.”  That got Peter’s attention.  But what was Jesus saying?
I understand Jesus to mean something like this.  “Peter, if you can’t submit to this, you don’t understand what I’m all about.  If you don’t see the role humble service toward others has played in my work, you can’t be on my team.  If you still believe you can tell me how I can and cannot carry out my mission, you’re not ready to do my work.”
I’m going to talk about more about the dialogue Peter and Jesus have in a moment.  Right now, let me observe some of the dynamics illustrated here.  These dynamics continue to be at work in almost every church.
Within every church there are those who are willing to be part of “The Order of the Throne and the Crown.”  These are people who want to run things, people who insist on their share of the accolades.  Their life-verse is Hezekiah 4:6, “If ye tooteth not thy own horn, the same shall not be tooted.”  (For the sake of those who might be new to the Bible, stop looking in your index—I made that up.)  Anyway, people who think like that create cliques around themselves and encourage those cliques to be more loyal to them than to the church.  Because the status quo has given them a place of prominence, they often make any real change impossible.
Thankfully, within almost every church there are those who are willing to be part of “The Order of the Towel and the Basin.”  What a contrast these people are.  They are the men and women who serve faithfully year after year, never asking to be specially recognized.  If their name is inadvertently omitted from some list of workers being honored, they don’t angrily call the pastor to complain.   Whether the task they are doing puts them in the spotlight or keeps them in the shadows doesn’t matter.  They’re simply glad for the opportunity to serve.
In some churches the members of the Order of the Throne and the Crown insist on having their contributions memorialized on brass plaques, in those same churches you can sometimes find the members of the Order of the Towel and the Basin quietly dusting those plaques.
But, now let’s go on with the story by considering …

The Servant’s Encouragement

The stories John recorded often involved layers of meaning.  Sometimes there is a story within a story.  The dialogue between Jesus and Peter is almost parenthetical to this story about Jesus’ washing the disciples’ feet.  That story could have been told without mentioning their discussion. 
The dialogue reflected Peter’s response to Jesus’ warning that a refusal to allow him to wash Peter’s feet would mean the disciple had “no part” with Jesus.
An unnerved Peter exclaimed, ``Lord, wash not only my feet; wash my hands and head, too!''  Peter was probably thinking, “O, man, I’ve blown it again.  I’d better make up for it.  If washing my feet is good, washing the rest of me has to be better.”
At this point Peter was still misunderstanding what Jesus was about.  He seems to have thought only in terms of the ritual.  He was confused but that shouldn’t surprise us.   Jesus had already said, “You’re not going to understand just now, but you will later on.” 
 So, Jesus responded by with an observation which every person present would have understood—on a purely physical level--Jesus said, ``The person who has already had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean.”  Traditionally, a Jewish person bathed before the Passover meal;   that being true, a brief walk to the site of the meal would only make their feet dusty or dirty.  Having already washed their bodies, only their feet would need washing.
That simple response seemed to satisfy Peter.  The reference to one of them not being clean was probably misunderstood to mean that someone had not bathed before coming.  Only later did he understand the reference was to Judas and only later did he appreciate the full implications of Jesus’ words, words that would be encouraging once they were understood.
Time would reveal there were two important principles and two great promises implicit in this brief dialogue.  The principles demand we make a reality check when we examine our spiritual lives.  The promises are the Servant-Savior’s encouragement in the face of what we discover.
Here are the two principles:  First, there is a cleansing every person needs if they would be a Christian.  Second, every Christian needs a source of continual cleansing to deal with those sins that mar our fellowship with Christ.
Now, here are the two great promises:  First, Jesus promises the spiritual cleansing we need to become a Christian, one of his followers.  Because of his death on the cross we may receive forgiveness when we place our faith in him. Jesus was referring to what his great work on the cross would accomplish.  The Servant Who Died would provide spiritual cleansing for those who believed.
Second, Jesus promises the spiritual cleansing we need to deal with those sins that threaten our fellowship with and effectiveness with him.  Bernard of Clairvaux understood this was behind the imagery: "Feet-washing is cleansing of those daily offenses which seem inevitable for those who walk in the dust of the world.”
Before the night was over Peter would fail Jesus miserably.  After the resurrection, he would discover the reality of those promises.
Every person who would follow Jesus’ example as a servant needs those promises.  Without them we can become spiritually self-centered, thinking only of how we can enhance our chances of acceptance before God.  With those promises, we are free to serve others with sincerity and genuine selfless concern.
We are then ready to hear,,,,

The Servant’s Exhortation


Jesus finished his menial task and returned to the table.  Then he provided a brief explanation for his outrageous behavior. (12-17)
That evening, when Jesus established the Order of the Towel and Basin, he demonstrated a great humility.  He challenged his followers to think about what he had done, to consider it in the light of their understanding of his identity.
They had called him “Teacher and Lord” and not once did he contradict them.  In fact, here and elsewhere he accepted their assessment.   What they said about him was true.  In this role he had the perfect right to be served. 
That was the basis of his challenge.  And at  this point Jesus’ logic is clear:  If I’m not too good to do such an act of menial service, neither are you.
So, Jesus said follow my example—I’ve washed your feet, you wash one another’s feet. 
I’ve already said I don’t believe Jesus was commanding us to do exactly what he did that evening.  Instead, when he told them he had given them an example, I think he was calling on them to discover ways to serve those they encountered, serve them with a selfless love.  He had provided a pattern, now they would find ways to put it into practice.
One of the reasons I struggled with the foot-washing on the youth missions was the fact that if felt most of our youth had been busy “washing feet” all week.
I thought of the young boy who told me he had cleaned a toilet in a soup kitchen, cleaned a toilet for the first time in his life.  Now, I suspect the toilet at his home was often cleaned—but I’ll let you guess who cleaned it. 
I thought of how our youth played with the young children they met, children who were sometimes dirty, children who touched their blond hair with sticky fingers because they had never seen hair like it.
I thought of how our youth group, usually being the smallest, so often had the privilege of cleaning up the restrooms at the end of the week.
They had already learned how to wash feet.

Conclusion

Over the centuries the church has often made its greatest impression on a culture because simple Christians have washed the feet of those no one else would touch.
In the Roman world, when plagues ravaged cities, Christians didn’t join the exodus of those fleeing the disease.  They stayed behind to help the sick and dying.  Those acts of compassionate service cause the pagans to realize the anti-Christian propaganda was full of lies, caused them to consider the claims of Christ.
In our own era, the ministry of nuns to AIDS patients made most thinking people discount the attacks saying the church was indifferent to the crisis.

Of course, there are many ways we can heed the Servant’s exhortation, we only have to be willing to pick up the towel and the basin.