Saturday, July 1, 2017

Walk and Think in Love

Paul urged his readers to imitate God.  He sums up that way of life by saying “walk in love.”  Sounds good.  Most of us are willing to say we could be more loving.  But, then, he gets down to cases.  He points to an example of this lifestyle.  This walking in love is seen in “Christ [who] loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.”
This keeps love from being a sentimental feeling of goodwill toward humanity, the feeling some have from about December 1 until New Year’s Day when we realize we have to start getting our taxes ready.
No, Paul points to a flesh-and-blood example of the lifestyle he described in a few words—kindness, compassion, forgiveness—at the end of the previous chapter.  (Remember, Paul’s letter would have had no chapter breaks; you would have segued seamlessly to these words.)  
A few years ago, some Christians began wearing bracelets or driving cars with bumper stickers that said WWJD.  Of course, the letters stood for “What Would Jesus Do?”  In time, the fad passed, perhaps because it became the  object of jokes from the unsympathetic.  But I remember a writer who was not known as a Christian suggested that as moral guidelines go it wasn’t so bad.  Better, at least, than “What Would Hitler Do,” for example.
Paul invites us to ask just that question.  It is behind what he says in Ephesians 5:1-14.
But answering that question isn’t easy, is it?  While Jesus is, at the writer of Hebrews says, “the same yesterday, today, and forever,” he did not talk about television, the internet, living in a pluralistic society, or how to vote in a democratic election.  This is why I am intrigued by verse 10: “Walk as children of light (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord.”  To walk as “children of light” implies that our worldview gives us a perspective for making moral choices, for shaping our lives.  In a culture shaped by a naturalistic philosophy—one that says this is all there is—we know there is Another.  We must bring God into the equations of life.
This is why the call to “try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord” is so significant.  It implies we must think about the moral questions of life, our responses must not be the mental equivalent of knee-jerk reactions to those questions.  They cannot be answers based on the way things used to be or based on a world we wish existed.  Yes, the Bible gives us principles to guide us but to know how to apply those principles we must use our minds.
Rene Patzia comments, “The Christian life…is not just a simple acceptance of doctrines and rules; believers are called upon to exercise intelligent judgment as they relate their theology to specific moral situations.”
Following the First World War, American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr became an outspoken pacifist.  Then, as news of the Nazi atrocities became known, he became a supporter of the military response to Hitler’s activities.  He explained that his earlier position was based on an optimistic naiveté, while his new view took into account the profound evil displayed in the fascist regimes.  He had thought deeply about the question.
Now, in this passage Paul says there are certain behaviors that no one whose thinking is based on “the light,” motivated by a desire to “please God,” can condone.
Paul’s own observation that “it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret” means that he doesn’t give us too many specifics. With that in mind let me offer some general observations drawn from what Paul says.
1.  Paul’s words imply that “living in the light…pleasing God” should shape our words as well as our actions.  Do his words mean Christians can’t tell jokes, can’t kid one another, can’t laugh?  I don’t think that fits with a faith that includes “joy” a one of its benefits.  Perhaps his words are a reminder that not everything that makes us laugh is truly funny.
2.  Paul wants us to remember that our outer behavior reflects our inner condition.  “Greed” reflects a commitment to something other than God, “idolatry,” in fact.  If we claim to be people of the light but live like those still in the dark, what does that say about our hearts?
3.  Paul insists that some expressions of our sexuality are wrong.  The phrase “sexual immorality and all impurity” refer to all manner of sexual behavior, such as promiscuity, adultery, and homosexuality.  Perhaps no other statement in this passage will inspire as much outrage. 
Our culture has come very close to saying that no expression of an individual’s sexual impulse should be denied.  No, we haven’t yet endorsed rape or child-molestation.  Yet, books that would have once been read with the curtains drawn are being openly read in coffee shops and airports.  And though Paul says believers are to have nothing to do with such behavior, we’ve all seen Christian women reading books like Fifty Shades of Grey.  Am I reflecting a kind of puritanical prudishness?  No, at least I hope not.  But, remember, the Puritans—flawed as they were in some areas—understood that what we think about will effect how we behave and the kind of behaviors we passively endorse.
Now, I admit that some of the issues Paul brings up in this passage are complex.  Christians must wrestle with some of the questions they raise.  The etiology or source of the homosexual impulse in an individual is not yet fully explained.  Most other behaviors condemned in the Bible can be described as acts a person takes.  The thief steals because he wants what you have.  Homosexuals explain their behavior as a reflection of their identity.  Recognizing this, I know that I must move cautiously in addressing their behavior.
I also must carefully distinguish my response from that of my fellow Christians who have no compassion for the homosexual.  I know that Christ died for the homosexual, just as he died for me, because both the homosexual and I are sinners.
I try to keep in mind that everywhere homosexual behavior is condemned in the Bible it is always linked with other sins.  To put the matter simply, if the Westboro Baptist Church wanted to be consistent in its protests, its members would need to carry signs saying, “God Hates Gossips.”  But I don’t believe that is the way to present the gospel.  The gospel begins with “God loves,” not “God hates.”
4.  Paul cautions about the kinds of words we listen to.  When he says “Let no one deceive you with empty words,” he may be saying there will be those who try to argue for the behaviors he condemns being innocent, nothing to make a fuss over.  Phillips renders this verse bluntly, “Don’t let anyone fool you on this point, however plausible his argument. “
Often, in the history of the church, there have been those who use smooth talk to argue that condemned behavior is really okay.  In nineteenth century America, there were several groups arguing that Christian love allowed for polygamy or what we would call “open marriages.”  Paul says we should weigh such claims against the message of the Bible.
Those who might look at the vast array of behaviors displayed in our culture and say “it’s all good” are simply wrong.
5.  Paul warns us that our behavior has consequences.  Again, what he says here is controversial.  Yet, his words reflect the Christian consensus until recent days. Some behavior belies our claim to be part of God’s Kingdom, our claim that we are living to please him. 
What this may mean for our own spiritual destiny should be carefully considered.  And, we should consider if our indifferent attitude might persuade others to be indifferent to their spiritual peril.
In any case, none of us can ignore the call to repentance and transformation implicit in these words.
6.  Paul makes our commitment to love a reflection of our identity as beneficiaries of God’s love in Christ.
Our behavior reflects our identity as children of God, children of light.  The dreadful charge of hypocrisy looms over anyone who forgets this.
Our behavior and attitude should be shaped by the call to “walk in love.”  But remember this is real love, the love that seeks the best for another.  Sentimentality that refuses to address soul-destroying behavior is not Christian love. 
Only behavior that reflects the tough love of Christ, the love shaped by kindness, compassion, and forgiveness, can make an impact.

How we demonstrate that love calls for us to be truly thoughtful.  We must weigh the words we use and the actions we take.  Our thinking must be shaped by what we know of Christ “who loved us and gave himself for us.”