Friday, August 12, 2016

Black Lives Matter--Reflections on a Slogan



I begin with a simple fact: Black lives matter.  It seems a simple statement but it sometimes inspires indignation and outrage.  Those who respond with such intense emotion fail to understand saying “black lives matter” no more diminishes the value of white lives, Asian lives, or any other non-black lives than saying “God bless America” somehow binds the Almighty to neglect the well-being of other nations.
With that in mind and without any further effort to appease critics I (a very, very white guy) want to offer some observations on the notion that black lives matter. Again, I do so not to answer critics but to help those who believe black lives matter toward greater clarity in that belief.
Black lives matter because each black life has potential to contribute positively to our society.
I was in the third grade when I did something (probably talking in class) my teacher believed merited discipline.  Her favorite discipline was sending students to sit alone in the cloakroom.  Isolated from their friends, errant students would soon learn to control their behavior so they would never again face such a harsh experience.  After my first cloakroom exile, I was eager for more of this delightful discipline.
You see, the cloakroom held boxes of books, books a lot more interesting than those we were reading in class.  In time, I would occasionally slip into the cloakroom when the teacher’s back was turned.  There I would sit and quietly read until she noticed I was gone.  Sometimes that took quite a while but let’s not explore what that might mean.
During one of my clandestine visits to the cloakroom, I found a brief biography of George Washington Carver.  Born a slave, Carver overcame adversity and prejudice to become the first black to teach at Iowa State, a faculty member at Tuskegee Institute, and an internationally renowned botanist.  I am sure I did not understand all the dynamics of his situation but I was impressed with this man who achieved so much.
Carver reminds us black lives have the potential to benefit us all.
Imagine the advances in science, technology, and medicine we might have known had black children not been forced to attend poorly funded public schools.  Imagine the novels, plays, and poetry we might have enjoyed had it not been illegal in some states to teach blacks to read and write.  Imagine how our cities might be different had black voices been heard, along with white, Asian, and Hispanic voices, in making crucial decisions.  Imagine how different our nation would be.
But what if those whose deaths inspired the “black-lives-matter” movement were never to have become the next Scott Joplin, Langston Hughes, Clarence Thomas, or Oprah Winfrey?  What if their now lost birthdays had led only to ordinary lives—9 to 5 jobs, mortgages, marriages, and children?
While the artist, the leader, and the innovator are needed in every culture, no culture can exist without the ordinary people.  Kipling wrote of such when he said, “The people, Lord, thy people are good enough for me.”
Again, black lives matter because blacks are created in the image of God.
In his message to the intellectuals at Athens, Paul sought to lay a foundation for communication and understanding.  Speaking of God’s creative activity, the apostle said, God “… made from one man every race of men.” (Acts 17:26 Mounce)  Whatever interpretive scheme they may apply to the Genesis account of creation, scholars agree the Bible sees the human race possessing an undeniable unity.  Thus, in his sermon, Paul “…rules out any kind of racism, since all ethnic groups come from one man.”[1]
Because of this unity, each individual, regardless of race, possesses what the Bible calls “the image of God.”   
That endows us with distinction. 
A few years ago Pat was looking through a news magazine we had just received when she suddenly said, “Flower died.”
“What,” I asked.  “Who’s Flower?”
She quickly reminded me that Flower was the leader of the little band of meerkats on the Animal Planet program Meerkat Manor.  The article explained Flower had died while defending her family from a cobra.
Although we had a tendency to humanize the little meerkats, their behavior after Flower’s death did not mirror typical human behavior.  There was no wake for Flower. No chimps brought covered dishes to the meerkats’ burrow to help them through the tough time.  The jungle animals did not form a procession to escort Flower’s body to its final resting place.  No woodpecker carved a placard to mark her grave.  In the weeks following her death, the lions and elephants did not convene a tribunal to censure the cobra, to demand the snake explain its actions.  The cobra certainly did not apologize or ask for mercy, promising to never again act in such a brutal way.  No, the cobra was simply acting out the law of the tooth and the claw.  When humans act out that law, we arrest them or call them barbarians.
Only the most ardent vegan fails to see the difference between an animal and a human; the Christian would explain that difference by pointing to the image of God.
While Christians have not always agreed on the meaning of “the image of God,” the fact humans are said to possess it gives them significance.

Possessing the image of God means we human beings were created as spiritual beings.  Human beings—regardless of racial identity—were created with the capacity to have rich and wondrous fellowship with the Creator.   The language of the Creation story suggests that once they could walk and talk with God freely and without hesitation.  Then, of course, something happened.  We don’t like to talk about it.  It’s worse than having an uncle who celebrates Hitler’s birthday.
In a single act of rebellion the relationship with the Creator changed.  So, too, did our relationship with our fellow human beings.  Our environment changed.  Our future changed.  But something did not change: we still possessed the image of God.
This tells us we have a special freedom.  We have the freedom to respond to God’s wooing Spirit calling us to reconciliation.  This freedom means the potential black lives have to be musicians, scientists, poets, or artists becomes insignificant compared to the potential they have for a vital relationship with God.     
One other thing did not change: God’s love for the rebels did not change.  They still mattered.
And, then, black lives matter because they are among those for whom Christ died.
My father, born in 1911, once told me he could remember hearing residents of his small, central Missouri hometown claim black people do not have souls (a notion once used to justify slavery).  Dad, who sometimes met with an African-American co-worker for prayer and Bible study, did not believe the claim but he wanted me to understand why some southerners might resist integration. 
Those who imagined blacks to be without souls probably did not know America’s great theologian Jonathan Edwards, though a slaveholder, had welcomed converted slaves into his Northampton, Massachusetts, congregation.  I doubt many people in that small town had ever heard of Richard Allen, founder of the African Methodist Episcopal Church; fewer still had likely heard of former slave and Moravian evangelist Rebecca Protten.  They probably did not realize white and black evangelists had sometimes worked together during the camp meetings that helped shape southern Christianity.  Doubtless they did not know the Pentecostal movement challenging the Baptist/Methodist hegemony in the Ozarks had been initiated, in part, by black ministers like William Seymour and Lucy Farrar.
White Christians, including white evangelicals, do not have a spotless record in race relations but most saw black lives as intended beneficiaries of Christ’s redemptive work.  The Great Commission would send the apostles out to preach the gospel to “all people in the world,” without exception. The beloved John 3:16 speaks of how God’s love motivated his giving his Son to die on the cross for “the world,” the whole world.  Grant LeMarquand uses John 3:16 to demonstrate how “The trajectory of Scripture is racially inclusive.”[2] 
This vision was clearly demonstrated in an incident Luke reports in Acts 8.  Philip, a leader and an evangelist in the early church, presented the gospel to an unnamed Ethiopian official (probably from today’s Sudan); the man believed and was baptized.  He returned as a Christian to his homeland where it is believed he shared his new faith.  So, during Christianity’s first generation, blacks were invited into embrace the gospel. 
While it may not have transformed attitudes as it should have, the little song many of us sang in Sunday school embodies a clear truth:
Jesus loves the little children,
All the children of the world.
Red and yellow, black and white,
They are precious in his sight.
Jesus loves the little children of the world.
Sure modern versions sometimes say, “Ev'ry color, ev'ry race, all are cover'd by His grace;” but that’s not how I learned it, probably not you either.  Besides, mentioning “grace” introduces a theological category we may have to explain.  Chances are most folks know what it means to be “precious.”
When little children grow up, whoever they may be, they remain “precious in his sight.”  They matter.



            






[1]  John Polhill, “Acts,” ESV Global Study Bible, Ed. Wayne Grudem, Wheaton: Crossway, 2012, note on Acts 17:26, p. 1557.
[2] G. LeMarquand, “Racism,” New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics, Ed. C. Campbell-Jack and G.J. McGrath, Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 2006, p. 936.