Saturday, January 3, 2015

Change of Plans The Original


I Thessalonians 1:1-3

While I am no longer preaching regularly, I plan to continue to maintain my blog.  I am hoping to begin with a series of messages I preached on First Thessalonians in 2006.  I have updated and repeated some of these messages in recent years.  For example, an abbreviated version of this message appeared in September.  This is the longer, fuller version.   It contains much more background information for the study of First Thessalonians.

It occurred to me the other day that mine may be the only dissertation written for a Baptist seminary that mentions “Billy the Kid.”
I mentioned Billy when I sketched the historical background of the Texas Panhandle just prior to the period I focused on in my dissertation.
Billy, the infamous murderous outlaw, and Pat Garrett, the lawman who eventually shot him, hung out in a wild and wooly town called Tascosa.   Throughout its active history Tascosa never had a church, the first church in the community was established well after the once bustling town began its decline.  Contrast that with the community called Clarendon.  It was founded as a temperance community by several retired Methodist ministers.  No alcohol was allowed there, prompting the local cowboys to dub the town “Saints’ Roost.”  Today, if you happen to be traveling between Amarillo and Wichita Falls, you’ll pass through Clarendon and you’ll see it has its share of liquor stores. 
The railroad changed things for both towns.  It bypassed Tascosa, leaving it to shrivel and die;  the railroad came through Clarendon, making it impossible for its founders to control who could move into the area.
The community of Dawn, where I served as pastor before coming here, didn’t make it into my dissertation but I had a chance to review its history when the community celebrated its centennial in 1988.   I saw a copy of the original plans for the city.  It included parks, schools, and a wide street through it called Grand Boulevard.  Dawn’s streets have no names; you just don’t need them in a village of 80 people.  [Update Note: In recent years, though the village hasn’t grown, the streets have been given names to meet the demands of UPS, FedEx, etc.]
Someone has said “life is what happens when you’re making other plans.”  The folks in Tascosa, Clarendon, and Dawn were all making other plans.  Things didn’t happen they way they planned.
The church in Thessalonica had other plans as well.  They expected things to work out differently.
   Somehow, these new Christians had concluded Christ’s return would occur during their lives.  Some of these folks were so confident Christ’s Return was just around the corner they stopped working, making them a burden on there more industrious fellow-believers.  Others began to worry when some of their fellow Christians died, wondering if they had somehow missed out on God’s plan for them. 
            Paul wrote to tell these Christians they would have to remain in a sometimes hostile world longer than they planned.
Of course, Paul had to address some other matters as well.  Someone, either in the church or on the outside, began to spread rumors that Paul wasn’t trustworthy.  Others in the church began to fall back into the old pagan lifestyle.  And, others began to form cliques which led to division in the church. This was truly a shame because the Thessalonian church had been a model of how the gospel brought men and women of diverse backgrounds together in a common commitment to Christ.   
In a way, every one of these problems could be traced to the fact things hadn’t worked out the way the Thessalonians expected.
Even if Burns hadn’t said it, sometimes the best laid plans of mice and men get plowed under.  If that’s never happened to you or to a church you’ve been part of, I Thessalonians may not have much to say to you.  But if you’ve seen plans changed by events over which you’ve had no control, if you’ve had dreams die, what Paul tells the Thessalonian Christians may be very relevant to you.

Letter to a New Church

Paul opens this letter to a new church in a conventional way.
(1)  The sender first identifies himself.  Paul, the missionary who was venturing into Europe with the Gospel.  "Silvanus" is in the Greek name of  "Silas," Paul's long-time traveling companion.  “Timothy” the younger helper;   not mentioned in Luke’s account of the founding of the Thessalonian church but was known to those Christians.

(2)   The sender mentions the recipient.  Paul wrote to the new Christians in Thessalonica, a prosperous trading center and provincial capital.  One ancient writer said, “As long as nature does  not change, Thessalonica will remain wealthy and fortunate.”   The population when Paul visited it was probably about 200,000.  The Jewish population was correspondingly large.
 The church Paul founded had a diverse make-up.  Jews, Greeks, men and women, all came to have faith in Christ.

Acts 17: 4.  Some of the Jews believed Paul and Silas and joined them. In the synagogue there were many Greeks, known as “God-fearers” because they worshiped the true God. Many of these believed.  There were also many important women. They joined Paul and Silas, too.  Some were converted out of rank paganism. 

Luke makes special mention of the women.  In Acts 17 they are described as women of the first rank--prominent women, high women, leading women.  Williams: "gentlewomen of high rank".  Luke doesn’t say whether their husbands became believers. 
The gospel appealed to all.  The gospel offered a view of women which was unique in the ancient world.

But the Jewish leaders became jealous--this led to trouble for the church from almost the beginning.  After no more than a few weeks, Paul and Silas had to flee the city, leaving behind a infant church which was not fully grounded in the Faith.
(3) Usually the writer says something nice to or about the recipient.
This could be an occasion for a lot of flattery.  Not here.
Paul “Christianizes” this opening. 
--His wish for them to have “grace and peace” was no mere convention.  He genuinely wanted God’s best for them.
--He reminds them of God’s involvement in their very existence as a church.  They were a spiritual community.
--He let them know how thankful he was for their lives and testimony.  His statement probably means that every time he prayed for the Thessalonian Christians, he expressed his thanks for what God was doing in and through the congregation.
Why Paul was Thankful:
Verse 3 summarizes why Paul was thankful for the Thessalonian church.
William's translation:   “… for we can never for a moment before our God forget your energizing faith, your toiling love, and your enduring hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.”
"your energizing faith"--something about their faith kept them going through the tough times.  Such faith kept them busy working for the Kingdom;  nothing--not trial or difficulty--shut them down.
This was a faith which allowed God to work in them and through them.

" your toiling love"--their love revealed itself in hard work.  The word “work” suggests it was intense and exhausting.
Love is not merely felt;  love is something you do.
"your enduring hope in our Lord Jesus Christ"--the passing of time and the increase of pressure did not change their hope, hope focused on the Lord Jesus Christ. 
Paul doesn’t specify the object of their hope but it was in what Jesus had done and would do.  It would have had a view toward a better future.
It may point to their experience of trial and  persecution for the faith.  There’s no reason to believe the trouble the Christians faced ended just because the evangelists left town.
Thomas comments on this quality of endurance:  “This is an aggressive and courageous Christian quality, excluding self-pity even when times are hard.  Difficulties endurance must cope with consist of trials encountered specifically in living for Jesus Christ.  Endurance accepts the seemingly dreary ‘blind alleys’ of Christian experience with a spirit of persistent zeal…and goes forward no matter how hopeless the situation.”
This may have been the first time Paul brought together the familiar virtues:  faith, hope, and love.
What does this say to us?
What should we take away from this first look at a church which had to face an unexpected future?

A church’s identity grows out of its relationship to God through Jesus Christ.

 The word Paul uses for church was ecclesia.  We get ecclesiastical from it, a word referring to things related to the church.  But ecclesia wasn’t a religious word.  It simply referred to an assembly of people who had come together for a purpose.
The Christian assembly at Thessalonica wasn’t just any gathering of like-minded people.  It was “in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”  Its unique character and purpose was rooted in that relationship with God. 
If we don’t keep that in mind, we risk losing our identity.  Our worship, our ministry, our prayers ought to be shaped by that reality.

Teamwork is crucial to a church’s health and prosperity.

Even though Paul was a powerful leaders, he didn’t build the Thessalonian church on his own.  He needed the help of others.
If our church tries to break out of the inertia which grips us, there won’t be any superheroes arriving to do what we all must resolve to do.

Even when a church isn’t perfect, there are usually reasons to be thankful for what God is doing in and through it.

As we’ll see, the Thessalonian church had problems.  Still, Paul and the others were thankful for it.
Shortly after I arrived here a woman attending the church at that time explained that she never invited friends to our church because we weren’t doing some of the things other, bigger churches were doing.
Poor woman.  She didn’t see the great things our church had to offer.  But I’m afraid her spirit was infectious.  I’m afraid the fact we don’t offer some of the same programs others churches offer, has made some feel we have nothing to offer.
That’s just wrong.  Ours isn’t a perfect church but we can be thankful for its strengths.  And we can pray that those strengths will enable us to work together to make a good church better.

When we face the reality of an unexpected future, we need to foster the qualities of faith, hope, and love.

We need a faith which will keep us going.
Let me be frank, this isn’t a faith which says, it doesn’t matter what you believe as long as your sincere.  It isn’t a faith which says, you believe one thing, I believe another, who know who’s right or if anyone is right.  Nor is it a faith which says there is only one way to believe—mine.
It is a faith which unites us in common agreement on the foundational elements of the Christian faith. 
In an age when all human problems are reduced to psychological, economic, or biological issues, we had better stand ready to affirm the biblical teaching that the great human problem is spiritual—our broken relationship with God.
In an age which denies the significance of Jesus Christ, we had better make him the central feature of our message.  We need to affirm his deity and his role as the God-appointed way to salvation.
In an age which scoffs at the church, we had better remember we are called to be salt and light in a dark and corrupt world, to be world-changers, to be the heralds of good news, the best news humanity has ever heard.
That kind of faith will bring us out on Sundays.  It will prompt us to rise censure and embarrassment to speak out for Jesus Christ.  It will shape a world-view which will challenge the culture around us.
We need a love which gives us an outward vision.
Several years ago, I heard a retired pastor tell about his experience as an interim pastor at a dying church.  Nothing he said could prompt the church to think outside its four walls.   He said that during his service there, the only significant decision the church made was voting to cut a foot off the inside ends of each pew.  The goal was to make it easier to push a casket down the aisle.
He realized most people saw the church as somewhere to wait until they died and then have a nice funeral.  It was an ingrown community.
Love, the love Jesus Christ longs to inspire within his people, will keep a church from being so self-centered it becomes deaf to the cries of a lost world.
It’s a love which will keep a church going when many say give up, quit, the people you’re trying to change aren’t worth the effort.
It isn’t really a tireless love, it’s a love that keeps going despite being tired.
Do you remember The Man of LaMancha?  Its best-known song is called The Quest.  It may not have been the author’s intention, but the song expresses the vision of one motivated by a God-inspired love.
To dream the impossible dream, to fight the unbeatable foe,
To bear with unbearable sorrow, to run where the brave dare not go,
To try when your arms are too weary, To reach the unreachable star:
This is my quest, to follow that star, No matter how hopeless,
No matter how far, to fight for the right, without question or pause,
To be willing to march into Hell for a heavenly cause.
And the world will be better for this: 
That one man scorned and covered with scars, still strove with his last
Once of courage to reach the unreachable star.

We need a hope which endures.
The Thessalonian church needed a hope which would help those Christians endure in the face of persecution.  It’s not as easy to be a Christian in America as it once was, but right now most of our churches face more urgent problems than hungry lions.
When a church realizes it has a problem, whether that problem is caused by division, by indifference, by inertia, or whatever, the caring members of that church wish the problem could be fixed in a week or two.  That doesn’t happen.   Problems which are years in the making take a while to fix.
We need a hope which will let us see beyond the now. 

Conclusion

When I first came to this church, this building was new.  Several people told me how you had planned it to be just the first phase of the building program, that you’d planned to build a new, bigger sanctuary in just a few years.  Unusually high attendance while you waited for the building to be finished prompted plans for a grand future.
Somehow, something changed.  The plan didn’t materialize.
 It probably isn’t fair to try to lay the blame on anyone.  Lots of things happened in those days.
Some were disappointed when a change they supported failed to become policy;   some were disappointed the change was even considered.
A beloved pastor moved on to another church.  Another pastor with a very different personality and temperament replaced him.  A change of pastors will sometimes attract people but more often, it will give people permission to leave.
Early on, one of you told me that, after the sanctuary was built, some seemed to take the “Field of Dreams” approach to church growth, an approach which focused on the new building.  These folks said, “If we build it, they will come.”  That didn’t happen.  But a more realistic approach to church growth didn’t replace the failed approach.
I don’t know how these things happened, but I do know that what happened to our church happened while many of us were making other plans.

When the plans change, a church has to go back to the beginning, back to the place when we trusted God for our very existence, sought God for direction, allowed God to form our character, and praised God for what he does in and through us.