Monday, June 17, 2013

A Desperate Father



John 4:43-54

John tells us about a desperate father, a father did what had to be done to save his child.

We know very little about this father.  He was an official in Herod’s court, he lived in Capernaum, and somewhere he had heard about Jesus.  Maybe he had been in Jerusalem for the Passover and witnessed the miracles Jesus performed.  Maybe he heard his neighbors talk about what they had seen. 

The most important fact about him is that his son was seriously ill.  Whatever the illness, it involved a fever.  This is why he found himself going to Jesus for help.  In our age we’ve become so accustomed to having aspirin and antibiotics that we may not fully appreciate just how serious this diagnosis was.   You may be sure the best physicians in Capernaum had seen this boy and they concluded that he was dying.  His desperate father determined to go to Cana and bring the Healer back with him.

Capernaum was located on the northwest end of the Sea of Galilee about twenty miles from Cana.  It would later become Jesus' base of operations for a while.  But right now it was simply the home of a father who wanted very much to see his son live. 

At this point there are probably a couple matters we ought to note about this father:

1.  He almost certainly had an inadequate understanding of who Jesus was.  There were traveling “healers” who sometimes traveled around Galilee.  It’s impossible to know if these individuals actually possessed any special healing abilities, but it seems the people believed they did.  This nobleman was convinced Jesus was such a healer.

2.  He had no way of knowing that what Jesus had been saying in his homeland.   John says that when Jesus returned to Judea, where he was born, he often reminded them that a prophet receives no honor in his homeland.[1]  Outside of Judea, would this man’s approach truly “honor” Jesus?

On the surface the Galileans seemed to welcome Jesus, even honor him,  but their respectful welcome was given only as long as Jesus behaved as they wished him to behave.  They thought of Jesus as the man who performed amazing miracles, turned water to wine, and did other things which left them speechless;  another words, they pictured Jesus as a man who gave them a good show.   They enjoyed Jesus but Jesus knew that if he defied their expectations, they would turn on him.

We need to keep this reality in mind when we look at the story of this desperate father.

We’re not told the exact conditions under which the father finally found Jesus but we are told of his plea for Jesus to come back with him.  The language is very strong, suggesting the man "begged" or "implored" Jesus to come.  Any parent can understand his desperation;   so, any parent can understood how he must have felt when Jesus refused to come. 

How could Jesus have been so indifferent?  How could he refuse?   To understand let’s take a look at the progress in this story.

The Call to Faith


What Jesus wanted was genuine faith from this father and from anyone who came to him.  Such faith included a proper understanding of who Jesus was.  At this point the father did not possess such faith.

Remember, he seems to have thought Jesus was just another miracle worker, like others who sometimes appeared on the Judean scene.  Some of these men were charlatans, but some seem to have possessed some kind of ability to bring about healing.  They may have possessed a rudimentary understanding of psychosomatic illness or they may have just had a knack for being in the right place at the right time so they could benefit from a sick person’s just getting better.  The people would have known nothing about psychosomatic illnesses; they thought these healers could change things just by being in the room.

This father seems to have seen Jesus in this way.  One clue  is his request that Jesus come back to Capernaum with him.  Apparently, it was firmly believed that the healer had to be present to heal.

This is why Jesus’ response was so unnerving.  It’s clear he was refusing to go.  His words were pointed:  “Unless you people see miraculous signs and wonders," Jesus told him, "you will never believe."

These critical words were addressed not just to that father from Capernaum but to all who had come to see what exciting things he would do.  Others may have been rebuffed by what Jesus said but this father wasn’t.  In fact, he seems to have heard something in Jesus words which encourage him to keep trying.  Lenski suggests that Jesus words were meant to convey a message which said, “Oh, that you were less concerned about miracles and more concerned about me.”

[I have some pastor friends in one of the Pentecostal denominations.  As you know, these folks have a strong faith in God’s power to heal.  Most Baptists believe God can heal, many Baptists believe God sometimes does heal.  The difference between us and the Pentecostals is, in some ways, a matter of expectation.  If someone were to be crass enough to ask a Baptist about the probabilities of God healing in a specific instance, we’d be likely to describe it as less likely than the average Pentecostal would.  Anyway, my Pentecostal friends tell me that they must sometimes warn their congregations about the danger of seeking the healing rather than the Healer.] 

That father from Capernaum seems to have heard Jesus say don’t focus on the healing, focus on me.

The father’s words in response to what Jesus said were much the same as before but his perspective seems to have changed.  Again, Lenski says that the man’s words now possess a “pleading reverence.”  But the real change is seen in his response to what Jesus says next.

Before we examine that response let’s look at something important happening in this story.

Jesus cared about this unnamed father despite the fact that he had a faulty theology.  Now it‘s important to see that Jesus did not leave his faulty thinking undressed; he offered a clear and pointed correction to his thinking.  If we would follow Jesus’ pattern, we would not reject any person as unreachable because their thinking might be faulty.  At the same time, we would be irresponsible to leave them in the grip of their false notions.

In an era when many are confused about what it means to believe in Jesus we need to look to this father to learn something about the character of faith.

The Character of Faith


 

How the father responded to what Jesus said helps reveal the character of the faith Jesus sought.  Jesus said to him, “Go, your son lives.''

How did he respond to Jesus?  The International English Bible puts it succinctly, “The man believed. He took Jesus at his word and left.”

He had gone from the superstitious notion that Jesus had to be present to do anything to understanding that this man’s power wasn’t limited by geography. 

The Galilean crowds "believed" only if they first saw, this man believed without first seeing.  He seems to have suddenly understood that Jesus' mighty works were "signs" pointing to identity; once that was established, his word should have been enough.

John can’t resist telling us what happened next. 

Jesus' words had been spoken early in the afternoon.  Even if the man started back to Capernaum immediately, he might have been forced to spend the night on the road since travel at night was often dangerous, due to robbers and wild animals.  His servants may have set out to retrieve their master as soon as it was certain the youngster was getting better or they may have set out early the next day.  In any case, the master was still on the road when he encountered his servants bringing the wonderful news of the boy's recovery. 

Had his servants known the purpose of his trip to Cana?  That's not clear. 

The man naturally inquired about the timing of the recovery.  In an age before clocks or other timepieces they were as precise as they could be, "Yesterday, about one o'clock, the fever left him."

The man then knew—and John lets us know—that this healing could be no mere coincidence. 

This man had come to understand what many Christians never fully understand.  Mature faith is rooted as much in what God says to us as it is in what we may or may not have had the privilege of seeing God do.

This takes us to the next stage of this story.

The Contagion of Faith


 

When the man got back home I can picture him finding his son sitting on his mother’s lap or playing with other children, laughing and healthy.  Things were back to normal.  But were they?  Do you suppose this man could ever forget his hurried trip to Cana?  Could he go on as if he had never met the remarkable Man from Nazareth?

The Gospels tell us that some who received Jesus’ blessings did forget, but not this man.

He told his family all that had happened.  And as a result all his family and household became believers.  Faith can be contagious.

There’s a cultural element which we should note.  In some cultures, the head of the household is so revered that his decisions establish the pattern for all other members of that household.  This may have happened here.  This doesn’t mean the faith of his family and servants was subnormal, it simply means they came to embrace that faith in a way which we Americans with our emphasis on individualism would find strange.  How they came to share his faith says nothing about the quality of their faith.  Robertson believes John is telling his readers that this household, a household with direct links to Herod’s court, had come to “complete faith in Jesus as the Messiah.”

Jesus appealed to all levels of society.  We see so many poor and powerless respond to him in the gospel that we forget he appealed to many in the upper classes as well.  During the so-called Domitian persecutions, one Christian executed was Flavius Clemens.[2]  He was a Roman consul and married to the emperor’s kinswoman, Flavia Domitilla.  While Flavius was executed, Flavia was exiled.  We don’t know what happened to their two sons, whom Domitian had designated as his heirs.  This prompted Harnack to write:  “What a change!  Between fifty and sixty years after Christianity reached Rome, a [grand]daughter of the Emperor embraces the faith, and thirty years after the fearful persecutions of Nero, the presumptive heirs to the throne were brought up in a Christian house.”[3]

Wouldn't it be wonderful to know what happened to this family in Capernaum once the gospel began to be preached?  As they began to hear the name of Jesus proclaimed by the earliest evangelists, they must have said to themselves, "We knew it--he was someone special."

In any case, John tells us that this was the “second sign” that Jesus performed after coming into Galilee.  Exactly what he means isn’t clear.  He himself tells us of other miracles.  I’d suggest John is trying to get us to pay special attention to the implications of this miracle, implications which go beyond the simple fact that it proved Jesus could heal over great distances.

 

Conclusion

This story has something important to tell us about the nature of faith.  It tells us that the quality of faith is measured by the degree to which we hear Jesus and take him at his word.
And, of course, taking him at his word honors him.

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1]  The exact meaning of that comment is debated.  In particular, it’s not clear what Jesus means by his “fatherland.”  One commentator lists some ten possible interpretations.
[2]  Technically, the couple was guilty of “atheism,” but historians believe this was an appellation for being Christians.
[3]  Bruce, p. 164.