The story of Christ's temptation is
found in each of the Synoptic Gospels--Matthew, Mark, and Luke but only Matthew
and Luke treat it at length. If you
compare their accounts, you'll find that the order in which they present the
second and third temptations differ.
This makes no difference since neither writer claims to be presenting
the material chronologically. Most
commentators, however, believe Matthew's account is probably chronological
.
As we look at the story, we may
wonder how the disciples learned about the experience. Simply put, we don’t know. However the Gospel writers learned about the
experience, they knew what it meant. It
meant Jesus understood.
*****
INTRODUCTION
Matthew 4:1-11
A few years ago an undeniable change in
attitude regarding Jesus began to emerge among Americans. For generations the orthodox teaching of
Christ’s sinlessness was embraced even by those who did not consider themselves
to be his followers. Then, in 2000, it
was discovered that fewer than half of American adults (40%) believe Jesus
lived a sinless life. Today, the
percentage of Americans who believe “that when Jesus Christ lived on earth He
committed sins” is closer to two-thirds.
About half of teenagers believe Jesus sinned.
Younger adults are more likely than older
adults to believe Jesus sinned. Members
of mainline denominations are more likely to see Jesus as a sinner than members
of non-mainline denominations.
The very notion that Jesus sinned runs
contrary to long-held beliefs about Jesus.
In fact, his sinlessness has traditionally been linked to his capacity
to serve as our redeemer.
Seeing Jesus as sinless is clearly rooted in
the teachings of the New Testament.
Consider what the writer of Hebrews says:
HEB 2:18 Because he himself
suffered when he was tempted, he is able to
help those who are being tempted.
HEB 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who
is unable to sympathize with
our weaknesses, but we have one who has been
tempted in every way, just as
we are--yet was without sin.
This is one reason why it is so important to
understand what happened during the temptations of Christ. We need to begin with a clear view of the man
who wandered into the desert following his baptism.
The portrait of Jesus the gospel wiriters
present is that of a man of purpose, a man who is clear-headed, capable of
recognizing even the most subtle of the Tempter's strategies. Still, he marched on to that engagement.
Indeed, the whole story suggests Jesus
apparently had no problem believing in Satan.
However the Evil One chose to appear to him, Jesus did not find it
necessary to say, "Who are you?"
As the eternal Son of God, he had known cosmic proto-Rebel from before
the Creation, had seen the product of his work in Eden, had seen his signature
on murder, war, child abuse, idolatry,
hypocrisy, and every other act of rebellion against God throughout
history. Christ knew the Enemy he would
face in the wilderness and he knew he would have to face this Enemy, not as the
Sovereign God of the universe, but as a human being weakened by hunger and
isolation. Christ knew this testing was
a necessary part of his role as God's anointed Messiah/Redeemer. Christ faced the Tempter knowing what was at stake.
But we can't forget that the Tempter faced
Christ knowing what was at stake. A
Second Adam had entered the arena. The
first Adam had failed, leaving the human race ravaged with sin. Should this Second Adam be victorious over
the Tempter, he could reverse Satan's victory.
As a consequence, Satan's assault was vicious and strategic.
The assault came in three waves.
1.
Satan tempted him with the prospect of immediate gratification of a
legitimate need.
MT
4:1 Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the
devil.
[2] After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. [3] The
tempter
came to him and said, "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones
to
become bread."
MT 4:4 Jesus answered, "It is written:
`Man does not live on bread
alone,
but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'* "
---- There was no sin in being
hungry. He had fasted forty days.
---- The same power which would, within a
short time turn water into wine, could have easily turned stones into bread.
---- Satan seems to be thinking, Can I
persuade him to use his power for himself?
---- What if Satan had succeeded? Would it have really mattered if the Son of
God had made lunch for himself? How
Jesus used the power which was rightfully his was of importance.
To have succumbed to Satan's suggestion would
make it easer to misuse his power later on.
---- Jesus would ofter perform miracles
on behalf of others, yet when the skeptics came demanding miracles, he
refused. He would not accomodate them by
saying, "For my next magical trick..." He would not build a following on the
sensational.
Yet, had he given in to this temptation it
might have been so easy to do so.
Listen to Malcolm Muggeridge:
"How
easy for Jesus to have turned these stone loaves into edible ones, as, later,
he would turn water into wine at a wedding feast! And, after all, why not? The Roman authorities distributed free bread
to promote Caesar's kingdom, and Jesus could do the same to promote his...
"Jesus
had but to give a nod of agreement and he could have constructed Christendom,
not on four shaky Gospels and a defeatred man nailed on a Cross, but on a basis
of sound socio-economic planning and principles.... Every utopia could have been brought to pass,
every hope have been realized and every dream been made to come true. What a benefactor, then, Jesus would have
been. Aclaimed, equally, in the London
School of Economics and the Harvard Business School; a statue in Parliament Square, and an even
bigger one on Capitol Hill and in the Red Square.... Instead, he turned the offer down on the
ground that only God should be worshipped."
Had he given in to this temptation, what
might his response have been when, hanging on the Cross, he heard these
words: "If you are the Son of God,
save yourself...?" If, out in the
wilderness, he had established the precedent of using his power for himself,
where might it have ended?
Jesus responded to this temptation, as he
responed to each of them, by quoting from the Bible, speciffically the book of
Deuteronomy. This Book recorded Moses'
final instructions for the People of Israel before they entered the Promised
Land. Had they given proper attention to
its teachings, they would have understood how to be God's People in the
world. Jesus turned to it because he was
determined to be God's Man.
Jesus's response establishes his priorities.
Jesus
answered, "It is written: `Man does not live on bread
alone, but on every word that
comes from the mouth of God.'"
Jesus is not saying that eating is
unimportant: He would include concern
for the hungry as a mark of those who follow him. He is saying that it is more important to
live according to God's will than to be able to sit down for a feast.
Later, Jesus would feed thousands who were so
intent on hearing his teachings they forget to bring food. Yet, he would send away those who began to
follow him just for the bread.
Jesus refused to act selfishly because that
wasn't God's will for him, a will revealed in the great OT promises about the
Messiah.
2.
Satan tempted him to manipulate God.
MT
4:5 Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the
highest
point of the temple. [6] "If you are the Son of God," he said,
"throw
yourself down. For it is written:
" `He will command his angels concerning
you,
and they will lift you up in their hands,
so that you will not strike your foot against
a stone.'* "
MT 4:7 Jesus answered him, "It is also
written: `Do not put the Lord
your
God to the test.'"
A quick study, this time Satan quotes the
Scriptures, Psalm 91, which, by the way, has nothing to do with jumping off
tall buildings. He used, or misused, the
Bible to make is seem as if his suggestion had a kind of spiritual authority. Ever since the church has wisely warned that
Satan, false teachers, and deranged fanatics can quote Scripture.
Among the three, this may be the most
difficult of the temptations to understand.
Was Satan trying to trick Jesus into
committing suicide? Not likely.
Was Satan tempting Jesus to use
sensationalism to draw a crowd rather than the teaching of God's word? It's not entirely implausible but no mention
is made of a watching crowd.
Satan seems to be tempting Jesus to seek
tangible confirmatin of God's care, confirmation beyond the simple promises of
God's Word.
More than that, his act would have reduced
God to doing our bidding. For this
reason, Jesus counters with a Scripture which reflects the respect we should
have before God: "Do not put the
Lord your God to the test."
Here’s an explanation from Robert Stein:
"Jesus recognized the fine
line between trusting God for the needs of life and challenging him to rescue
him from artificially created dificulties.
The former would be an act of faith, the latter an evil challenge and
dare placed before God."
The temptation to seek some tangible proof of
God's care is strong, the temptation to manipulate God is stronger. Our rewponse ought to be simple faith and
unwavering awe.
3.
Satan tempted him to take a shortcut, which would circumvent God's plan.
MT 4:8 Again, the devil took him to a very
high mountain and showed him
all
the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. [9] "All this I will give
you,"
he said, "if you will bow down and worship me."
MT 4:10 Jesus said to him, "Away from
me, Satan! For it is written:
`Worship
the Lord your God, and serve him only.'* "
This was a no-holds barred match. Satan offers Jesus a shortcut to a
kingdom. Satan showed offered him a way
to fulfill his role as Messiah without the Cross.
The kingdom Satan offerred was not a
spiritual kingdom, it was the merely political authority. While some were looking for a political
Redeemer, what the world needed was a spiritual Redeemer. The world's problems would not be solved by a
crossless Christ.
Jesus knew the Cross was ahead of him but he
wouldn't bow to Satan. Again, God's word
established the only course opeen to him:
"Worship the Lord your God and serve him only." Any other choice would lead to failure.
Once again, here’s a comment from Robert
Stein:
"At
his temptation Jesus settled once and for all the kind of Messiah he would
be. he would not use his messianic
powere for his own ends. Jesus rejected
all political concepts of the messiaship...
In stead he would accept the pats of the sufering servant that God had
ordained for him. He would trust God for
his daily needs, even as he taught his followers to trust God. He would experience hunger, hostility, sorrow
and frustration like the others. As he
faced the cross he would not use his messianic power to rescue himself."
The story ends with a picture of angels
caring for the Victor. Is is an
encourageing vision but somehow we know the Tempter will be back.
OBSERVATIONS
Let me make some observations about this
story:
1. It
reminds us that Jesus' ministry involved an assault on the power of
darkness.
2. In
reminds us that doing God's will isn't always the easy way, it's the right way,
but not always the easy way.
3. It
reminds us about the real nature of temptation and the path to victory.
Ultimately temptation involves the attempt to
seduce us to choose a course other than that which God has directed. Sin consists in taking that course.
The Jesus who was victorious over the Temptor
was a man of the Word, a man of faith, a man of prayer. He made use of resources every believer has.
4. It
reminds us that when we fail we may turn for forgiveness to one who understands
the power of temptation.
B F Westcott wrote:
"Sympathy
with the sinner in his trial does not depend on the experience of sin, but on
the experience of the strength of the temptation to sin, which only the sinless
can know in its full intensity. He who
falls yields before the last strain."
Although Jesus emerged the victor in this
conflict he did not taunt his followers for their weaknesses, rather he taught
them to pray: "lead us not into
temptation." Temptation is no
trivial matter.
When we fail, how important to be able to
turn to the One who was victorious on our behalf.