A
couple weeks ago I presented a study of the words the Bible uses to describe
sin. I hope that helped clarify the
meaning of sin but we need to remember that “sin,” however it is described, is
not a problem other people have.
Romans 3:23
During much
of 1665 a fire raged across England and parts of Europe. It was not a fire of
flames and smoke, although that kind of fire would, according to some, prove to
be the salvation of the suffering residents of London. No, this fire was the fire of agonized
breathing and raging fever. This was the
plague, a recurrence of the so-called “Black Death” which had ravaged Europe
before.
The plague
of 1665 took an estimated 65,000 to 100,000 lives.
Each
morning wagons rolled through the streets of the larger cities gathering the
dead for mass burials.
Rich, poor,
young, and old all fell prey to the plague.
At the
time, not even the best scientific minds could explain its origin. Some believed the dogs and cats might carry
the disease so they recommended killing them, even if the rats they kept away
became a problem. But, in the end,
they just didn’t know where the plague
had come from. (If you know your history you know why this reprieve for the
rats was a bad idea.)
The human
race is suffering from another disease, one far more deadly than the plague.
Where did
the pandemic called sin come from?
Any
discussion of sin will ultimately lead to the opening chapters of Genesis.
If we look
at the habitat in which God placed the new Creature, the “crown of his
creation,’ it’s evident that what took place could not be blamed on the
environment (Genesis 2:4-25)
--The man
and woman seemed to have the same faculties as modern men and women: Their nature included a social, spiritual,
and volitional aspect. There is evidence
of great intelligence. Adam and Eve
don't appear to have been primitive men and women.
--They
possessed a capacity for fellowship with God which seems to exceed that of the
greatest saints.
--They
possessed a capacity for genuine sexual enjoyment without regret, guilt, and
abuse which often mars that enjoyment today.
--They were
granted almost unlimited opportunity to use their intelligence and creativity.
--The
freedom was immense and the restrictions were limited. In fact, there was only one. They truly lived in paradise. How long would it last?
Not
long. The story of the Fall tells of how
sin entered the human race. (Genesis 3:1-6:10)
The story
introduces us to a fourth party in the Garden, the serpent. Later we will learn that this serpent was
somehow the tool of Satan. His origin is shrouded in mystery, but it soon
becomes clear that Satan is both the enemy of God and humankind.
His tactics
were those displayed again and again in the Scripture.
--The
Target: The Woman. Why did Satan target the woman? Not because she was innately weaker than the
Man. Satan would have been content to
bring down either the Man or the Woman, for he probably knew bringing down the
one would bring down the other.
Satan's tactics were the same he is seen
to use elsewhere: (1) He sought to create doubt regarding the
validity of God's word, (2) He sought to create doubt regarding the
goodness God [God is depicted as holding something good back from Man.]; (3) he promised what he could not deliver,
equality with God.
The
Woman made her decision on her own. So
far as we know, she did not consult her husband; she certainly did not consult
God, despite having regular, intimate fellowship with Him. Her's was an early example of secularist
thinking.
There
is some hint that the temptation may have been going on for some time. She finally succumbed. The course of the failure can be seen as
progress from seeing the beauty of the fruit, reflecting on its pleasant
aspects, and finally touching it to consume it.
Although
she did not immediately die, something inside her must have died. She must have sensed the effect of her
disobedience almost immediately, yet she had the Man join her in disobedience. In so doing she became Satan's vehicle, a
tool more effective than the serpent.
--The
Willful Joiner. Romantics have suggested
that Adam, having seen what the woman had done, joined her in disobedience so
they would not be separated. More likely
Adam simply chose to listen to one whom he respected, with whom he had shared
joy and pleasure, and who--despite her disobedience--had not died.
The
act of disobedience was simple but it was enough to be a tragedy of cosmic
proportions.
(1)
Humankind was left with a sense of guilt and shame
(v7).
Here’s John Davis on the impact of their rebellion:
The tempter promised that eating the fruit would
open Adam's and Eve's eyes, but he did not say what they would see. They saw themselves as sinners devoid of
their original beauty. They saw good and
evil only from the standpoint of sinners, from the rock-bottom level of
corruption. They became like God in that
their natures were fixed, but God was confirmed in holiness while they were
confirmed in sinfulness....Seeing their nakedness in a new light, they
experienced shame and disgrace. In a
pitiful attempt to replace the radiant garments of their innocence, they sewed
together fig leaves. Man has ever since
attempted to cover his guilt and assuage his conscience. His efforts...still fall far short of God's
demands.
(2) Humankind experienced separation from God.
Where there was once communion, now there was estrangement.
Think about this. Once humankind’s relationship with God was so
real that God was a Friend with whom you took walks in the park. In time, some would deny that Friend’s
existence.
(3) Humans experienced estrangement from one
another.
Do I need
offer evidence for this? Just listen to
the nightly news—stories of war, murder, crime…
(4) Humans
experienced physical death as the
culminate the experience of spiritual death.
The Bible
makes it clear that somehow, some way, what happened in the Garden has impacted
the entire human race.
Original
sin does not mean that every sinner is original. No sinner is a wicked as he might be, every
sinner is wicked enough to demonstrate the universal presence of sin in the
human race.
I’ve never
listened to “country music” that much but even I’ve heard of Hank Williams,
heard of his hard living, his drinking, his early death. A few years ago Hank Williams, Jr. responded
to the question “Hank, why do you drink?” by saying he was “Keeping Up an Old
Family Tradition.” When you and I sin,
we are keeping up an old family tradition.
Just how extensive is the problem of sin?
Every man,
woman, and child carries the heritage of sin.
1. Much of the Bible
is written with the assumption of the universality of human sin. For example, the sacrificial system of the
Old Testament is predicated on the notion of sin. Even the high priest must provide an offering
for his sins.
The
prophets often indicted nations surrounding Israel as well as Isreal itself.
The
universal calls to repentance imply universal sin.
--Charles
Ryder Smith (1953): "The universality
of sin is taken as a matter of fact. On
examination, it will be found that every speech in Acts...and every Epistle
just assumes that men have all sinned.
This is also the assumption of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels...Jesus
deals with everyone on the assumption, 'Here is a sinner'."
2. Let’s look at some
key passages establish the notion of universal sin:
--GE 6: The
Lord saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every
inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. … the
earth was corrupt in God's sight and was full of violence. God saw how corrupt
the earth had become, for all the people on earth had corrupted their ways.
This
assessment of the sinfulness of the human race apparently applies to the entire
race. The indictment of the
Anti-diluvian age suggests that humanity was manifesting self-centeredness,
violence, and impiety.
The
subsequent failure of Noah is a stark reminder that human sin did not drown
with the Flood.
--1KI 8:46 "When they sin against you--for there is
no one who does not sin--and you become angry with them and give them over to
the enemy, who takes them captive to his own land, far away or near;
( 2 Chronicles 6:36 is a parallel passage.)
--These
passages are from Solomon's prayer for the dedication of the new temple. With admirable honesty he acknowledges that
"there is no one who does not sin"--a statement which would include
both the nobility and the commoner. The
great promise of revival in 7:14 is, in part, God's response to this prayer.
Solomon--wise
observer of life--had concluded that sin was a universal aspect of the human
race.
--PS 53:3
Everyone has turned away, they have together become corrupt; there is no one
who does good, not even one.
This
psalm deals with those whose lifestyles are lived as if there were no God. They are secularists from a pre-secular
age. When an individual or a culture
abandons God, the results will be devastating.
Excluding God from their lives does not make them sinners, it reveals
their sinfulness.
--PR 20:9
Who can say, "I have kept my heart pure; I am clean and without sin"?
Passage
seems to suggest that the best of us have mixed motives and sullied hearts.
--ECC 7:20
There is not a righteous man on earth who does what is right and never sins.
Although
the writer of Ecclesiastes is noted for his dismal portrayal of life, he is
simply being a realist. No hero is
beyond the corrupting power of sin.
--ISA 53:6
We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and
the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.
In
one of the most familiar passages about the Suffering Servant, the prophet lays
an indictment against the human race. We
have all willfully abandoned God's will.
We are all sinners.
--Romans
3:23
Probably
the most frequently quoted verse on the universality of sin. The statement comes at the end of a longer
passage on the nature and character of sin.
Ralph Earle says, "This is the most definite statement on the
subject in the entire Bible." The
language suggests that all have sinned in the past and continue to fall short
of "God's glory as he wishes it to be manifested to them and through
them."
A
declaration that sin is pandemic, that every person is a sinner, that every
culture is in rebellion against God is difficult for some people to
accept. They like to point out that
existence of certain simple, loving tribes that don’t share the vices of the
West. These people are considered as
proof that sin is not universal.
Let me try
to offer an explanation of what this verse means.
Maybe you’ve
seen the film “The Gods Must Be Crazy”.
The movie introduces us to a tiny African tribe made up of poor but
happy, loving men and women. Their life
together is harmonious, free from jealousy and conflict.
Then, one
day, the tribe comes into possession of a strange object: An empty Coke bottle carelessly thrown out by
the pilot of a small plane.
Knowing
nothing about airplanes or litter, the tribe assumes the bottle is a gift from
the gods. The bottle is useful and
beautiful.
Soon
trouble begins. Each member of the tribe
wants the bottle for himself or herself.
For the first time jealousy and envy are displayed. Even though they try passing the bottle
around, no one could stand another person having the cherished bottle.
At last,
one of the tribesmen comes to his senses and realizes what is happening. Concluding that the gods were crazy to give
them such a dangerous gift, he resolves to take the bottle to the edge of the
world and throw it back to the gods.
The rest of
the movie chronicles his adventures. As
the film concludes, the tribe has returned to normal.
The film
seems to suggest that “things” cause all our problems. But that interpretation really misses the
point.
What we
really discover is that lurking within our souls are monsters like greed,
jealousy, resentment, and envy just waiting to be awakened. Those monsters dwell even in the hearts of
those who seem to be the most innocent.
--GAL 3:22
But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given
through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.
The
"whole world is prisoner to sin" is an indictment of the entire
world.
In
December, 1996, speakers at the World Council of Churches' meeting in Brazil
urged Western missionaries to stop their aggressive evangelism techniques
because they were destroying indigenous cultures. As a case in point, the speakers accused
missionaries of destroying the native population of Hawaii.
Such
critics do not generally acknowledge the notion of the universality of sin.
There’s a
part of the story they don’t tell. Hawaii
was the first mission field in history where the missionaries voluntarily left
because they believed the Hawaiians were ready to take over the work. The Gospel is often embraced by these
non-western peoples with enthusiasm. The
amazing success of the gospel in such cultures suggests that these peoples are
keenly aware of their spiritual need.
The Bible
does not call us to deny the good in other cultures or to say that no virtue
exists in non-Christian people. It does
demand that we identify sin as sin. Paul
spoke of sin as characterizing both Gentiles and Jews, thus avoiding charges of
provincialism.
EPH 2:1-3
As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to
live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom
of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time,
gratifying the cravings of our sinful nature and following its desires and
thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath).
These
verses open a passage in which Paul describes the work of Christ within the
believer. To underscore the wonder of
God’s grace, Paul reminds his readers of their condition before Christ.
REFLECTIONS:
1. The Bible makes no distinction between peoples who
possess the Law and those who do not--all are sinners.
2. Almost every major
world religion believes that something is wrong with the human race. Even new age thinking recognizes that
something is wrong, but it does not place it in a moral context.
3. Honesty demands I
admit that even if Adam had not fallen, I am probably fully capable of assuring
the presence of sin in the universe.
A few
months ago I was out walking on one of those rare sunny days. With the sun at my back, I happened to look
down. There, on the sidewalk in front of
me, was my father’s shadow.
When I look
at my life in the light of God’s Word, I see Adam’s shadow.
CONCLUSION
You and I,
with nothing more than knowledge gleaned from a high school health class, know
more about the spread of disease than the best-trained physician in the 17th
century.
It would be
centuries before science understood how the plague was spread. We now know the disease was spread from the
rats to their fleas and, in turn, to people.
So, when the doctors advised getting rid of the dogs and cats people
kept to kill rats, they had no way of knowing that they were aiding in the
spread of the disease.
Responding
to the physicians’ inability to come up with an effective cure, the people
tried to find some on their own. We have
a reminder of one of those ineffective cures in a children’s rhyme.
The
original version is a little different than the one we’re familiar with but you’ll
recognize it.
Ring a ring
of rosies.
a pocket
full of posies;
Atisoo,
Atisoo,
All fall
down!
“A ring of
rosies (or roses)” refers to the rash which accompanied the disease. “Atisoo” refers to the terrible sneezing that
overcame the victim just before death.
The deadliness of the disease is recalled in the phrase “All fall down.”
To what
does “a pocket full of posies” refer? It
refers to the belief that a pocket full of flowers would ward off the
disease. It didn’t.
There have
been many foolish and useless attempts to deal with the pandemic we call sin.
They have been as effective as a pocket full of wilted flowers.
The Bible tells
us there is only one effective way to deal with sin. That is through faith in Jesus Christ whose
death made it possible for us to experience forgiveness and salvation.