Luke
10:38-42
Some might
read this story and accuse Luke of “airing dirty laundry,” of telling a story
that should have been kept quiet, not put out for public consumption. On the other hand, this story reminds us that
real disciples sometimes have trouble in day to day situations, trouble finding priorities.
We encounter
Martha and Mary here and elsewhere in the gospels. They had a brother Lazarus who apparently
lived with them but whether Lazarus was living with them at this time isn’t
clear. In the most memorable story,
found in John’s Gospel, Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead.
Luke’s story
suggests Martha owned the home. She may
have been a widow who shared a home with the unmarried or widowed Mary and,
perhaps, Lazarus. We simply don’t know
as much about the family as we might like.
The old Mormon tradition that Jesus was married to Martha, Mary, and
Mary Magdalene has no biblical foundation.
What we do
know from the scriptures suggests that Martha was the older to the two and that
she possessed a tendency to be more actively involved in practical matters
while Mary appears to have been more retiring.
But the hints of their personality differences are only hints and we
should not push them too far.
In any case,
when Jesus traveled to their village—Bethany, according to John—he and his team were
welcomed by Martha. As she busied
herself with meal preparations, Jesus began teaching a group of his
followers. Among those listening to him
was Mary. With Martha busy in the
kitchen and Mary quietly listening in the “living room” the stage was set for
the encounter Luke reports.
At some
point, Martha leaves the kitchen, goes to where the impromptu class is going
on, and interrupts Jesus to say, “Lord, doesn’t it seem unfair to you that my
sister just sits here while I do all the work? Tell her to come and help me.”
(New Living Translation)
The Cause of Martha's Anger
What might
have been the cause of Martha’s anger?
Perhaps it
involved simple sibling rivalry. Don’t
imagine I’m importing a modern notion into the Biblical account; there are
instances of such rivalry in the Scripture.
We see it with Joseph and his brothers, in the behavior of David’s
sons. To a degree, it goes back to Cain
and Abel.
Even if this
wasn’t true sibling rivalry, we can imagine Martha being somewhat
resentful. After all, she had invited
Jesus into her home, she was the hostess, and Mary was the one benefiting from
his company. Lest you think I’m laying
out the plot of a Hallmark Channel movie, let me say this scenario need not
have any romantic overtones.
Of course,
Martha might have been embarrassed. In
such a social setting, women were to remain with the women and the men with the
men. The only time the women were to
enter the men’s company was when they carried in food or drink. Put simply, Mary was behaving inappropriately
by the standards of the day.
Martha may
not have perceived the revolution that was going on in her living room. She had probably heard the local rabbi talk
about how it was a waste of time to try to teach a woman. They couldn’t grasp the intricacies of
theology. Perhaps, at this time, Martha
believed it.
In the late
nineteenth century, Mrs. James Himes, a Baptist from the state of Georgia,
wrote a letter to praise the Southern Baptist Convention for refusing to allow women
messengers, representatives. She said,
“it was the duty of men to see that no heads inferior to their own should be
permitted to supervise the vast network of missions.”
If Martha
believed she and other women possessed such “inferior” minds, she would have
believed Mary could better spend her time helping make their guests
comfortable—been more effective doing “women’s work.”
But, as I said, a revolution was going on in
that living room. The phrase Luke uses
in describing Mary sitting at Jesus feet is a figure of speech that means she
was learning as a disciple would. Jesus
treated women in a new way. He engaged
them in serious discussion of serious topics.
He took them seriously. Had
Martha realized what was happening she might have rejoiced that her sister was
there.
While these things may have played a role in
Martha's feelings, Luke describes her problem as being
"distracted." She was trying
to do so much that she couldn't do anything.
She became frustrated and angry.
Instead of telling herself she might have taken on too much, she laid
part of the blame on her sister.
Though she had set out to honor the Lord, she
found herself blaming him as well. Her
frustration level was such she failed to see the irony of calling Jesus
"Lord" and then questioning his concern for her.
David Garland suggests Martha was the victim
of "well-intentioned overactivity."
She wanted Jesus to feel welcome, in contrast to Simon the Pharisee who
treated Jesus with notable contempt.
Whether she had heard of what happened at Simon's house is anyone's
guess, but she intended to be the best hostess.
What went wrong was allowing her plans to
dislodge what ought to have been her priority--enjoying the time with the
Lord.
Recently a friend told about his wife's
activities at Christmas. They mirrored
what she did at Thanksgiving. With her
sons, daughters-in-law, and grandchildren coming, she attempted to prepare all
the special dishes they loved. Doubtless
she had set out to do something nice for them.
But, interestingly, she refused to allow
anyone else in the kitchen. As the long
day of cooking wore on she became increasingly irritable and resentful. She lost sight of the purpose of the family
getting together in the first place. Her
grandchildren were coming to think of the holidays as times of stress and
tension.
While most commentators refer to women
working away in the kitchen as examples of this loss of priority, the problem
isn't just found in the kitchen. Nor is
it gender-specific.
We've all known people in our churches who
are over-committed. They simply won't or
can't say "no" to some task in the church. While their service may begin in an earnest
desire to show their love for The Lord, it has become something different. Perhaps it is now a source of self-worth. Or, perhaps it is simply a joyless duty.
If it is the first, nothing will be allowed
to stand in the way of their service to the church--not family, not
friends. Their children grow up knowing
that vacations, school activities, and even events like birthdays must take
second place to church responsibilities.
Otherwise mom or dad might be considered to be lagging in devotion.
If it is the second, their joyless duty
becomes manifest in every action.
Nothing that they do is appealing or inspirational to others.
Most of our churches just let people like
this work on, offering an occasional word of commendation. We rarely offer a word of correction since we
don't want to dampen anyone's enthusiasm and we wonder if they are really
overactive or we are under-active.
A Lesson in Priorities
Jesus, however, counters Martha's complaint
with a gentle rebuke.
"Martha," he said, "you are anxious and troubled about
many things, but one thing is necessary.
Mary has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from
her."
Jesus is using the moment to teach Martha a
lesson in priorities. He even links it
to a meal. The term "the good
portion" refers to that portion of a dish that is the tastiest, most
succulent. That was Mary's. What Martha had chosen was not bad but it
wasn't the best. To put it another
way: Being hospitable is good, caring
for your guests is good, but there is something better.
The point is not that service is unimportant
or a waste of time, but service is no substitute for a growing relationship
with the Lord. Somehow Mary had realized
that.
Mary would not have allowed her guests to go
hungry. But she knew the Lord well
enough to know he would have been satisfied with some bread and perhaps some
fruit or vegetables. If there were some
dried fish on hand she might have added that.
Perhaps she had heard the disciples discussing Jesus' instructions when
he had sent out the seventy: "Eat
what is set before you." In any
case, she seems to have known the Lord had no need of a great feast such as
Martha insisted on making.
Mary seems to have instinctively known what
was most important. Martha was confused
on the matter. Jesus' words to
Martha--and to all of us--are in invitation to occasionally reassess what we
consider to be our chief priority.
As I was reviewing Luke's account of Jesus'
ministry and teachings, I realized there were two instances in which he speaks
to the matter of priorities.
There is this story where he speaks to one
who has a commitment to him. Then there is
another moment when Jesus addresses the problem in a parable.
And he told them this parable:
"The ground of a certain rich man yielded an abundant harvest. He thought
to himself, 'What shall I do? I have no place to store my crops.' "Then he
said, 'This is what I'll do. I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones,
and there I will store my surplus grain. And I'll say to myself, "You have
plenty of grain laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be
merry." ' "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life
will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for
yourself ?' "This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for
themselves but is not rich toward God.".
(Luke 12:16-20)
Here is a person who appears to have a
completely secular mindset. He gives no
thought to his soul (the reference to soul suggest an internal dialogue).
Many today deny the existence of an eternal
soul. Convinced that all of life is the
result of random chance, they believe humans are merely so much organic
matter. This man might have well be in
their number. He is a materialist with
the materialist's creed: "Rest,
eat, drink, and be merry." Jesus
pictures him as supposing this is all one needs to be concerned about.
His rude awakening reminds him there is more
to life. We have a spiritual nature and
we ignore it to our peril.
The Spectrum
So in these two account we see there is a
broad spectrum of spiritual recognition.
On one end we have Mary who knows she need to
see to her spiritual life and so she places herself in a situation where that
nurture can take place.
On the other end of that spectrum we see one
who does nothing to nurture his spirit.
His mindset doesn't even prompt him to give thanks for his material
blessings or to suppose his wealth might allow him to do something about the
poor around him.
George Barna has written about what he calls
"the seven faith tribes" in America.
One of these tribes consists of "the skeptics." They deny or seriously question the very
existence of God. His research
discovered that this group was the least-likely to give to charity. They seem to believe, if people are
successful (like the man in the parable), it is their own doing; if they are
poor, that's their doing as well.
At the same time they see little need of a
supportive community. They are smart
enough, intuitive enough, and shrewd
enough to stand on their own. The man in
the parable, standing at the far end of the spectrum, mentions no friends or
even family. His wealth he will spend on
his own pleasure.
Along this spectrum, with Mary at one end and this Rich Fool at
the other, was Martha. She was, of
course, closer to Mary than she was to that foolish farmer. But her confusion about what was really
important robbed her of the joy that might have been hers. It kept her from knowing the peace that comes
from recognizing that grace makes our effort to impress God unnecessary. It kept her from seeing that whatever she
placed before her Lord, if given in love, would be acceptable.
At the same time, she failed to see how her
frenzied, complaining brand of discipleship might have turned the curious away
from faith and commitment.
Like all of us, from time to time, she needed
a priority adjustment.
Conclusion
There are others who need to have their
priorities adjusted.
Those who live like the rich farmer with no
acknowledgment of God's claim on their lives need to weigh the consequences of
their approach to life, need to consider if the notion that this is all there
is fits the evidence around them, the evidence in their own hearts.
Those who live like Martha should strive to discern
the best from the good. They should seek
to avoid the distractions that keep them from the wealth of blessing God has
for them. They should focus on the
"the good portion."
All of us have only so much time. We must prioritize. We must sort the good from the better. We know this if we claim to be
Christians. As Christians, we might wish
to have a good and comfortable home, but know if we are enslaved by a mortgage
we may not be able to give priority to opportunities to serve and worship the
Lord. As Christian parents, we might
want our children to know the joy playing sports, but know we should give
priority the life and training the church offers. As Christians, we rightly want our priorities
to match God's priorities.